Integrating Environmental Concerns: Evaluation of GGDP Innovation Economy Based on Entropy Weight and Coefficient of Variation
DOI: 10.23977/infse.2024.050207 | Downloads: 14 | Views: 483
Author(s)
Chenyi Qiu 1, Yihua Tu 2
Affiliation(s)
1 School of Economies, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China
2 School of Communication and Information Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China
Corresponding Author
Chenyi QiuABSTRACT
This study responds to the environmental repercussions of emphasizing Gross Domestic Product (GDP) over ecological concerns, like excessive resource depletion. With a pressing need for a more sustainable economic measure, we advocate for "Green" GDP (GGDP) as a holistic substitute. Our focus lies in integrating natural resource preservation into economic evaluations and promoting global accord on sustainable economic progress. Strategically selecting key economies worldwide, we redefine resource depletion and environmental degradation costs within GGDP assessments. Using methods like Entropy Weight and Coefficient of Variation, we establish a robust GGDP model. We also evaluate climate mitigation indicators across various countries, showcasing GGDP's positive impact through methods like BP neural networks. Additionally, we assess GGDP's resilience to fluctuations using predictive models like LSTM, highlighting its effectiveness in climate mitigation compared to GDP. This transition gains support from cosine similarity analysis, emphasizing GGDP's alignment with environmental indices. Enhancing the GGDP model through various analyses and incorporating indicators like GNI and research expenditure, our proposed framework emerges as a comprehensive, stable alternative, supporting sustainable economic growth while curbing environmental impact.
KEYWORDS
Entropy Weight, Coefficient of Variation, BP neural network, LSTMCITE THIS PAPER
Chenyi Qiu, Yihua Tu, Integrating Environmental Concerns: Evaluation of GGDP Innovation Economy Based on Entropy Weight and Coefficient of Variation. Information Systems and Economics (2024) Vol. 5: 51-57. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/infse.2024.050207.
REFERENCES
[1] Wen, Z., Zhang, K., & Du, B. (2004). Deficiencies of the current GDP accounting system and its revision--methodology and case study. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Science Edition), (03), 43-46. https://doi.org/10.16493/j.cnki.42-1627/c.2004.03.010.
[2] Li, J. L. (2021). Green development accounting of Daihai watershed based on GGDP, GEP, and GEEP. Inner Mongolia University. https://doi.org/10.27224/d.cnki.gnmdu.2021.000742.
[3] Zhao, Z., Luo, Y., & Huang, J. (2019). Global warming and sea level rise. Advances in Climate Change Research, 15(06), 700-703.
[4] Chen, L.P., & Yang, Z. Z. (2005). Empirical analysis of green GDP accounting in China. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology (Social Science Edition), (06), 64-68. https://doi.org/10.16822/j.cnki.hitskb.2005.06.015.
Downloads: | 14556 |
---|---|
Visits: | 285490 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Accounting, Auditing and Finance
-
Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management
-
Tourism Management and Technology Economy
-
Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
-
Financial Engineering and Risk Management
-
Accounting and Corporate Management
-
Social Security and Administration Management
-
Population, Resources & Environmental Economics
-
Statistics & Quantitative Economics
-
Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management
-
Social Medicine and Health Management
-
Land Resource Management
-
Information, Library and Archival Science
-
Journal of Human Resource Development
-
Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
-
Operational Research and Cybernetics