Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

A Critical Analysis of the Appellate Body's Interpretation of the Concept of 'Likeness' as Found in Article III GATT

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/law.2023.021002 | Downloads: 29 | Views: 413

Author(s)

Chenyu Xiao 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Faculty of Social Science and Law, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1QU, United Kindom

Corresponding Author

Chenyu Xiao

ABSTRACT

This paper set out to analyses the Appellate Body's interpretation of 'likeness' in Article III The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), this analysis is based on the backdrop of increasingly dynamic and extensive trade between countries around the world. The development of goods exchanged has contributed to a boom in international trade, but also has inevitably given rise to a number of disputes. This paper gives an account that these trade disputes mainly stem from disagreement in the interpretation of keywords in the GATT provisions. This is why the interpretation of 'likeness' is important, the understanding of 'likeness' directly affects whether a country's adoption of different policies for products violates its national obligations under GATT. In this article, the Appellate Body's interpretation of 'likeness' is analysed with a focus on the cases of Alcoholic Beverages II (1996) and EC-Asbestos (2000). The Appellate Body's approach to the interpretation of 'likeness' in these two cases is analysed, as well as the logic and rationality of this interpretation. The validity of the Appellate Body interpretation is also analysed in light of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT). This essay analysed and found that the Appellate Body's interpretation of 'likeness' is both comprehensive and consistent with the general principles of treaty interpretation of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties(VCLT). However, there are some drawbacks such as the Appellate Body's interpretation of 'likeness' is too vague and subjective and based on only a single method of interpretation.

KEYWORDS

The Appellate Body; GATT; 'likeness'; Alcoholic Beverages II (1996); EC-Asbestos (2000); Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties(VCLT)

CITE THIS PAPER

Chenyu Xiao, A Critical Analysis of the Appellate Body's Interpretation of the Concept of 'Likeness' as Found in Article III GATT. Science of Law Journal (2023) Vol. 2: 7-13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2023.021002.

REFERENCES

[1] Peter Van, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization (Cambridge University Press 2005).
[2] The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT).
[3] Donald H Regan, 'Further Thoughts on the Role of Regulatory Purpose under Article III of the GATT' (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade 737.
[4] Donald H Regan, 'Regulatory Purpose and "like Products" in Article III: 4 of the GATT (with Additional Remarks on Article III:2)' (2002) 36 Journal of World Trade 443.
[5] I Van Damme, 'Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body' (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 605.
[6] Petros C Mavroidis, 'No Outsourcing of Law? WTO Law as Practiced by WTO Courts' (2008) 102 American Journal of International Law 421.
[7] Mireille Cossy, 'Determining Likeness under the GATS: Squaring the Circle?' [2006] SSRN Electronic Journal.
[8] Peter Van, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization (Cambridge University Press 2005).;Report of The Working Party, Border Tax Adjustment (L/3464, BISD 18S/102) 2 December 1970, para 10.
[9] Inid (n 10) para 17-18; Peter Van, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization (Cambridge University Press 2005).
[10] Mitsuo Matsushita, 'The Sutherland Report and Its Discussion of Dispute Settlement Reforms' (2005) 8 Journal of International Economic Law 623.
[11] Report of the Panel, EC--Asbestos (WT/DS135/R) 18 September 2000, pp 7.
[12] Appellate Body Report, EC--Asbestos (WT/DS135/AB/R) 12 March 2001, para 88.
[13] Peter M Gerhart and Michael S Baron, 'Understanding National Treatment: The Participatory Vision of the WTO' (2004) 14 Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 505 <https://mckinneylaw.iu.edu/iiclr/pdf/vol14p505.pdf> accessed 30 January 2023.
[14] Rodoljub Etinski, 'A Critical Review of Interpretation of Articles III and XX of the GATT 1994'  (2018) 52 Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad 819.
[15] Hélène Ruiz Fabri, 'The WTO Appellate Body or Judicial Power Unleashed: Sketches from the Procedural Side of the Story' (2016) 27 European Journal of International Law 1075.
[16] Gustavo Adolfo Guarin Duque, 'Interpreting WTO Rules in Times of Contestation (Part 2): A Proposed Interpretation of Article XXI(B)IiIii of the GATT 1994 in the Light of the Vienna Convention of the Law of the Treaties' (2019) 14 Global Trade and Customs Journal 31.
[17] John H. Jackson, "National Treatment Obligations and Non-tariff Barriers", Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 10 (Winter 1989), p. 212. 
[18] Peter Van, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization (Cambridge University Press 2005). 
[19] Robert E. Hudec, "GATT/WTO Constraints on National Regulation: Requiem for an 'Aim and Effects' Test", in Hudec, Essays on the nature of international trade law, (London: Cameron May, 1999), p.361.
[20] Robert E. Hudec, "GATT/WTO Constraints on National Regulation: Requiem for an 'Aim and Effects' Test", in Hudec, Essays on the nature of international trade law, (London: Cameron May, 1999), p.364.
[21] Appellate Body Report, Korea--Various Measures on Beef (WT/DS161/AB/R) 11 December 2000.
[22] Ibid para 1-2; Peter Van, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization (Cambridge University Press 2005); Korea – Various Measures on Beef (2001).
[23] Matsushita, M. (2005). The sutherland report and its discussion of dispute settlement reforms. Journal of International Economic Law, 8(3), 623-629.
[24] Won Mog Choi, 'Overcoming the Aim and Effect Theory: Interpretation of the Like Product in GATT Article III' (2002) 8 U C Davis J Int'l L & Pol'y 107.
[25] Marco Bronckers, 'Rethinking the "like Product" Definition in WTO Antidumping Law' (1999) 33 Journal of World Trade 73.
[26] Lisa Anouliès, 'The Strategic and Effective Dimensions of the Border Tax Adjustment' (2015) 17 Journal of Public Economic Theory 824.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.