Administrative Litigation of Government Procurement Contract Dispute
DOI: 10.23977/law.2023.020807 | Downloads: 25 | Views: 438
Author(s)
Jiacheng Liu 1
Affiliation(s)
1 Law School, Hunan Normal University, Orange Isle Street, Changsha, China
Corresponding Author
Jiacheng LiuABSTRACT
Since lawmakers believe that the exercise of executive power is not involved in the process of concluding government procurement contracts, the current system stipulates that in disputes caused by government procurement, suppliers can resort to administrative litigation or civil litigation according to the difference between the pre-contract stage and the contract performance stage. However, government procurement contracts of both civil and administrative nature, even contract disputes caused in the process of performance, still involve the consideration of administrative purposes, which needs to pay attention to "power control" and the protection of public interests in the judicial review process. Therefore, administrative litigation is more suitable for judicial review of government procurement contract disputes than civil litigation because of its objective litigation nature.
KEYWORDS
Government Procurement, Contract Dispute, Administrative LitigationCITE THIS PAPER
Jiacheng Liu, Administrative Litigation of Government Procurement Contract Dispute. Science of Law Journal (2023) Vol. 2: 45-50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2023.020807.
REFERENCES
[1] Kai Wang. Application of two-stage Theory in Government Procurement [J]. Journal of Yunnan Administration College, 2010, 12(05):147-149.
[2] Jihua Hu. Interpretation and Practical Guide of Government Procurement Law of the People's Republic of China [M]. China Democratic and Legal Publishing House, 2002:28.
[3] Fengyun Liang. Some theoretical preconditions for the revision of Administrative Litigation Law (from the perspective of objective litigation and subjective litigation) [J]. Journal of Law Application, 2006(05):72-75.
[4] Xiaogang Ma, Yatao Chai. The Reconstruction of the Theory of Litigation Purpose in the Context of the Culture of Right [J]. Journal of Northwest University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 46(02):102-106.
[5] Beigeng Xiao. The Defects of Government Procurement Act Concerning the Scope of Accepting Cases in Administrative Litigation [J]. Administrative Law Review, 2005, (02):111-115.
[6] Yu Lingyun. Administrative Contract Treatise [M]. Tsinghua University Press, 2022:264-265.
[7] Xiao Beigeng. Principles of Government Procurement Law [M]. World Book Publishing Corporation, 2026:182.
[8] Hongfeng He. Further analysis on the legal nature of government procurement contract [J]. China Government Procurement, 2017(02):18-21.
[9] Fengyun Liang. Handouts of judicial interpretation of administrative agreement [M]. People's Court Press, 2020:44.
[10] Tianhao Chen. The improvement of government procurement relief system from the promulgation of the Regulations on the Implementation of the Tendering and Bidding Law: Taking the experience of France as a reference [J]. Western Law Review, 2012, (06):72-82.
[11] Xiezhong Cheng. On the Objective litigation orientation of Administrative litigation in China [J]. Contemporary Law Review, 2020, (02): 75-86.
Downloads: | 4215 |
---|---|
Visits: | 97897 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
-
Information and Knowledge Management
-
Military and Armament Science
-
Media and Communication Research
-
Journal of Human Movement Science
-
Art and Performance Letters
-
Lecture Notes on History
-
Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
-
Philosophy Journal
-
Journal of Political Science Research
-
Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
-
Advances in Broadcasting