Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

The Validity of the Commitment of "Divorce without Property Rights" in the Jurisprudential Perspective

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/law.2023.020805 | Downloads: 18 | Views: 347

Author(s)

Mocheng Sun 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Law School, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, 100088, China

Corresponding Author

Mocheng Sun

ABSTRACT

As a kind of marriage and family relationship maintenance mode, marital loyalty agreement has gradually become a new marriage and family mode, which strengthens the fulfillment of husband and wife's loyalty obligation. The promise of "Divorce without property rights" is the concrete manifestation of the husband and wife's loyalty obligation in the marriage law, which is similar to a kind of sworn right, but lacks the legal obligation validity guarantee. Therefore, there are differences and disputes in the identification of the effect of "Divorce without property rights". How to accurately position and judge the effectiveness of the promise of "Divorce without property rights" is the key to properly solve the problem of divorce property disputes in China. In the civil law circle, the discussion on the effect of the commitment to Divorce without property rights mainly focuses on the basic concepts of civil law, such as expression of intention, contract and contract, and the content of the discussion is mostly partial to the theory of department law. How jurisprudence is involved in the study of the effect of "Divorce without property rights" commitment and how to optimize the legal analysis of this legal phenomenon is another dimension to solve this problem. Jurisprudence can provide argumentation ideas for civil judgment. Jurisprudence takes the resources in the field of general jurisprudence as a reason or argument to support the views of judicial judges, which can enhance the reasoning effect of judicial judgment. Regarding the attitude towards the effectiveness of the "Divorce without property rights" commitment, there is not much difference between jurisprudence and civil law, and it is only effective, invalid or depending on the situation. What jurisprudence needs to do is to clarify the connotation and legal basis of the promise of "Divorce without property rights", optimize the legal analysis of the promise of "Divorce without property rights", and put forward theoretical viewpoints that are in line with the legal principle and sense, so as to provide new judgment ideas and sufficient reasoning value for the judiciary.

KEYWORDS

Jurisprudence; Divorce without property rights; Marital loyalty agreement; Validity judgment

CITE THIS PAPER

Mocheng Sun, The Validity of the Commitment of "Divorce without Property Rights" in the Jurisprudential Perspective. Science of Law Journal (2023) Vol. 2: 30-38. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2023.020805.

REFERENCES

[1] Yu Yanman, The Original Theory of Kinship Law, Law Press, 2007, p. 286.
[2] Zou Xiaoqin, "Private Law Dilemma and Solution of Marital Property Agreement System", Hebei Law Science, Hebei Law Science, No. 7, 2021, p. 134.
[3] Li Shanping, Loyalty Agreement in the Era of Civil Code, Shanghai Jiaotong University Law Review, 2022(5).
[4] Zhu Xiaofeng, The Concept of Family in Civil Law, Tsinghua Law, No. 5, 2020, p. 100.
[5] Hao Liyan, "Restrictions on marital property Agreement under Typical marriage Model", Journal of China University of Political Science and Law, No.3, 2022.
[6] Xia Yinlan and Liu Zhengfeng, "Traditional Inheritance and Modern Reform of the Marital Property System on both Sides of the Taiwan Strait", Journal of China University of Political Science and Law, No. 6, 2013, p. 48.
[7] Tian Shaohua, The Legal Application of real right Changes in the field of marriage, Law, 2009(3).
[8] Zhang Wenxian, The Fifth Edition of Jurisprudence, Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2018.
[9] Article 3 of the Interpretation of Several Issues of the Supreme People's Court on the Application of the Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China (I) provides that: "If a party brings a lawsuit based solely on Article 4 of the Marriage Law, the people's court shall not accept the lawsuit, and the ruling already accepted shall reject the lawsuit."
[10] Xia Yinlan, Marriage and Family Inheritance Law, Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2012.
[11] Wang Lei, "On the Reference of Identity Relationship Agreement to the Civil Code Contract," Jurist, No. 1, 2020, p. 32.
[12] Qi Enping and Zhao Xiangling, "Analysis on the Validity of Divorce without property rights Agreement", Tianjin Law, No. 3, 2019, p. 9.
[13] Yu Chengyuan, The Validity Review System of Family Contract in the era of Civil Code, Social Sciences, 2021(5).
[14] Shen Chen, Validity Recognition of Marital Agreements from the perspective of Civil Code, Law Review, 2021(6).
[15] Shi Shangkuan, On Kinship Law, Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2000.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.