Author(s)

Pingyuan Ge ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ Computer Science and Technology Department, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai, Shandong 264010

Corresponding Author

ABSTRACT

Education plays an important role in social life and human society. However, in the world, due to different levels of economic development, traditional culture, values, policies and regulations, historical development and other factors, there are huge differences in the higher education system of different countries. It requires us to develop a model that can be used to evaluate the health of higher education systems in any country. We start from two angles. First, from a macro perspective, the higher education system of a country is rated by collecting relevant data of different regions, cultures and countries with different economic development in the world. Another Angle is from the perspective of classification, from the macro point of view of the country's higher education system to grade. Although the final result this method is intuitive, but only from the final score to assess its higher education system is very one-sided, so we will have the same characteristics of countries get together for a class, this not only can compare for different categories of countries, in order to optimize the its higher education system, but also the original evaluation model with partial faults are optimized. We applied the above model to 17 countries around the world, evaluated them reasonably, and selected one country with room for improvement in its higher education system -- Canada.

KEYWORDS

CITE THIS PAPER

Pingyuan Ge, Research on comprehensive evaluation of education based on TOPSIS method. Transactions on Comparative Education (2021) Vol. 3: 65-69. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/trance.2021.030212

REFERENCES

[1] Cheng Tianbao. Characteristics of Higher Education in Canada [J]. Henan Education: Higher Education Edition (middle), 2010.
[2] Chang-jun yue. The population of higher education of international comparison [J]. Journal of comparative education research, 2004, 25 (002): 11-15.
[3] Xu Yini. The Relationship between Economic Level and Educational Level [J]. MING magazine, 2017.
[4] Zu Wenling, Zhang Rui. The National Ranking of the Comprehensive Competitiveness of the World First-class Universities -- China ranks second in the number of universities and four first-level indicators, while the United States ranks first [J]. Evaluation and Management, 2019, v.17; No.69 (04): 89-89.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

• Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology
  
  
• Curriculum and Teaching Methodology
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Advances in Vocational and Technical Education
  
  
• Adult and Higher Education