Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

The Infringement Risk and Legal Regulation of Generative AI Works

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/law.2023.020704 | Downloads: 355 | Views: 1914

Author(s)

Yuan Zhao 1

Affiliation(s)

1 China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, China

Corresponding Author

Yuan Zhao

ABSTRACT

Generative artificial intelligence is a type of artificial intelligence technology that can automatically generate or modify text, images, audio, video and other content by using large scale language models or deep learning techniques. Generative artificial intelligence has great creativity and influence, which can provide convenience and value for various industries, as well as bring potential risks and challenges. Therefore, the legal regulation of generative artificial intelligence is a complex and dynamic issue, which requires careful and comprehensive analysis and evaluation. This paper briefly compares and analyzes the situation of legal regulation of generative artificial intelligence in the European Union, the United States and China, and puts forward some suggestions and recommendations for legal regulation.

KEYWORDS

Generative AI works, infringement risk, legal regulation

CITE THIS PAPER

Yuan Zhao, The Infringement Risk and Legal Regulation of Generative AI Works. Science of Law Journal (2023) Vol. 2: 21-30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2023.020704.

REFERENCES

[1] Wang Q (2017). On the qualitative determination of content generated by artificial intelligence in copyright law. Legal Science (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law) (05), 148-155.
[2] Wang L (2018). New challenges to civil law in the era of artificial intelligence. Eastern Law (03), 4-9.
[3] Tian Y (2021). Construction of China's Financial Condition Index and Analysis of Market Early Warning. In The 2021 12th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics (pp. 210-217).
[4] Liu X. X., & Zhang H (2018). On the tort liability of artificial intelligence. Nanjing Social Sciences (09), 105-110.
[5] Xiong Q (2018). Explanation of judicial identification standards for fair use of copyright. Law (01), 182-192.
[6] Liu Q., & Sun Q. S (2020). Research on copyright infringement issues of artificial intelligence works. Journal of Hunan University (Social Sciences Edition) (03), 140-146.
[7] Zeng T (2019). Research on copyright infringement issues of artificial intelligence creation. Hebei Law Science (10), 176-189.
[8] Wang Y., & Ye M (2019). Conflict and balance between personal data sharing and privacy protection in the era of artificial intelligence. Theory Guide (01), 99-106.
[9] Cheng L., & Liu X (2023). From principles to practices: the intertextual interaction between AI ethical and legal discourses. International Journal of Legal Discourse, (0).
[10] Liu Y. L., Huang L., Yan W., Wang X., & Zhang R (2022). Privacy in AI and the IoT: The privacy concerns of smart speaker users and the Personal Information Protection Law in China. Telecommunications Policy, 46 (7), 102334.
[11] Feng X. Q., & Pan B. H (2020). Research on the recognition and protection of property rights of artificial intelligence "creation" -also on the "first case of copyright infringement of content generated by artificial intelligence". Journal of Northwest University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) (02), 39-52.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.