Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Portrait analysis of gravity sphere of influence and spatial interaction intensity of urban logistics center—A case study of Zhengzhou City

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jceup.2023.050804 | Downloads: 14 | Views: 428

Author(s)

Gao Yang 1,2

Affiliation(s)

1 Graduate School, Jose Rizal University, Mandaluyong District, Manila, 0900, Philippines
2 Family Building of Ruzhou Federation of Trade Unions, Ruzhou, Henan, China

Corresponding Author

Gao Yang

ABSTRACT

By using space syntax and word vector theory respectively, this paper optimizes the measurement method of comprehensive strength parameter and distance parameter in the gravity model, combines the subjective feeling and preference law of logistics elements on spatial structure when they travel with the spatial distribution form of material supply and demand, and realizes the identification of urban logistics center and the division of gravitational sphere of influence. Then, a complex network is constructed on this basis, and the spatial interaction strength between logistics centers is presented by using edge weights. Finally, the dynamic and static form portrait analysis of urban logistics center is completed.

KEYWORDS

Logistics center, spatial syntax, word vector, gravity model, spatial interaction

CITE THIS PAPER

Gao Yang, Portrait analysis of gravity sphere of influence and spatial interaction intensity of urban logistics center—A case study of Zhengzhou City. Journal of Civil Engineering and Urban Planning (2023) Vol. 5: 24-28. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jceup.2023.050804.

REFERENCES

[1] Li Xin. Analysis of the gravitational range of influence and spatial interaction intensity of urban logistics center —Take Zhengzhou city as an example [J / OL]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Natural Science edition) (Chinese and English): 1-11 [2023-05-22]. DOI:10.13471/j.cnki.acta. snus. 2022, D076.
[2] Dablanc L, Ogilvie S, Goodchild A, 2014. Logistics sprawl: differential warehousing development pat‐ terns in Los Angeles and Seattle [J]. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2410(12): 105-112.
[3] Sakai T, Kawamura K, Hyodo T, 2015. Locational dynamics of logistics facilities: Evidence from Tokyo [J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 46(6):10-19.
[4] Verhetsel A, Kessels R, Goos P, et al, 2015. Location of logistics companies: a stated preference study to disentangle the impact of accessibility [J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 42(1): 110-121.
[5] Rivera L, Sheffi Y, Knoppen D, 2016. Logistics clusters: the impact of further agglomeration, training and firm size on collaboration and value added services [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 179(9):285-294.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.