Portrait analysis of gravity sphere of influence and spatial interaction intensity of urban logistics center—A case study of Zhengzhou City
DOI: 10.23977/jceup.2023.050804 | Downloads: 14 | Views: 428
Author(s)
Gao Yang 1,2
Affiliation(s)
1 Graduate School, Jose Rizal University, Mandaluyong District, Manila, 0900, Philippines
2 Family Building of Ruzhou Federation of Trade Unions, Ruzhou, Henan, China
Corresponding Author
Gao YangABSTRACT
By using space syntax and word vector theory respectively, this paper optimizes the measurement method of comprehensive strength parameter and distance parameter in the gravity model, combines the subjective feeling and preference law of logistics elements on spatial structure when they travel with the spatial distribution form of material supply and demand, and realizes the identification of urban logistics center and the division of gravitational sphere of influence. Then, a complex network is constructed on this basis, and the spatial interaction strength between logistics centers is presented by using edge weights. Finally, the dynamic and static form portrait analysis of urban logistics center is completed.
KEYWORDS
Logistics center, spatial syntax, word vector, gravity model, spatial interactionCITE THIS PAPER
Gao Yang, Portrait analysis of gravity sphere of influence and spatial interaction intensity of urban logistics center—A case study of Zhengzhou City. Journal of Civil Engineering and Urban Planning (2023) Vol. 5: 24-28. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jceup.2023.050804.
REFERENCES
[1] Li Xin. Analysis of the gravitational range of influence and spatial interaction intensity of urban logistics center —Take Zhengzhou city as an example [J / OL]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Natural Science edition) (Chinese and English): 1-11 [2023-05-22]. DOI:10.13471/j.cnki.acta. snus. 2022, D076.
[2] Dablanc L, Ogilvie S, Goodchild A, 2014. Logistics sprawl: differential warehousing development pat‐ terns in Los Angeles and Seattle [J]. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2410(12): 105-112.
[3] Sakai T, Kawamura K, Hyodo T, 2015. Locational dynamics of logistics facilities: Evidence from Tokyo [J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 46(6):10-19.
[4] Verhetsel A, Kessels R, Goos P, et al, 2015. Location of logistics companies: a stated preference study to disentangle the impact of accessibility [J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 42(1): 110-121.
[5] Rivera L, Sheffi Y, Knoppen D, 2016. Logistics clusters: the impact of further agglomeration, training and firm size on collaboration and value added services [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 179(9):285-294.
Downloads: | 3873 |
---|---|
Visits: | 110445 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Sustainable Development and Green Buildings
-
Landscape and Urban Horticulture
-
Bridge and Structural Engineering
-
Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
-
Journal of Municipal Engineering
-
Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning
-
Indoor Air Quality and Climate
-
Computer Aided Architecture Design