Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Risk Mitigation for SMEs: A Step-by-Step Guide to Implementing an Effective Framework

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/ferm.2023.060808 | Downloads: 37 | Views: 569

Author(s)

Safiye Turgay 1, Abdulkadir Aydin 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey

Corresponding Author

Safiye Turgay

ABSTRACT

The success and sustainability of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) significantly influences by their ability to identify, assess, and mitigate risks effectively. However, many SMEs often lack the resources and expertise to establish a robust risk management framework, leaving them vulnerable to potential threats and uncertainties. This comprehensive guide aims to bridge that gap by providing SMEs with a step-by-step approach to develop and implement an effective risk mitigation framework. The guide begins by highlighting the importance of risk management in the context of SMEs and its direct impact on their long-term growth and survival. A framework for ranking and categorizing risks based on their severity provided to help SMEs allocate resources efficiently. Once risks identified and prioritized, the guide delves into risk mitigation strategies. Various risk treatment options, including risk avoidance, risk reduction, risk transfer, and risk acceptance, explored in detail, enabling SMEs to make informed decisions based on their specific risk appetite and capacity. To ensure successful implementation, the guide outlines a step-by-step plan to integrate risk management into the organization's culture and operations. Key stakeholders' involvement and clear communication channels emphasized to foster risk-awareness throughout the SME. Furthermore, the guide underscores the significance of continuous monitoring and evaluation of the risk management framework. Periodic reviews allow SMEs to adapt their strategies as the business landscape evolves and new risks emerge. Real-world case studies and best practices incorporated throughout the guide to offer practical insights and illustrate the benefits of a well-structured risk management framework. By following this step-by-step guide, SMEs can proactively mitigate risks, enhance their decision-making process, and fortify their business against potential threats, ultimately paving the way for sustainable growth and long-term success.

KEYWORDS

Risk Mitigation; Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs); Risk Management Framework; Step-by-Step Guide; Effective Implementation; Risk Assessment; Risk Treatment

CITE THIS PAPER

Safiye Turgay, Abdulkadir Aydin, Risk Mitigation for SMEs: A Step-by-Step Guide to Implementing an Effective Framework. Financial Engineering and Risk Management (2023) Vol. 6: 71-80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/ferm.2023.060808.

REFERENCES

[1] Mamoghli, S., Goepp, V., Botta-Genoulaz, V. (2015). An operational Risk Factor Driven approach for the mitigation and monitoring of the Misalignment Risk in Enterprise Resource Planning projects, Computers in Industry, Volume 70, June, Pages 1-12. 
[2] Madanaguli, A., Dhir, A., Talwar, S., Clauss, T., Kraus, S. (2023). Diving into the uncertainties of open innovation: A systematic review of risks to uncover pertinent typologies and unexplored horizons, Technovation, Volume 119, January, 102582. 
[3] Horváth, D., Szabó, R. Z. (2019). Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4. 0: Do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 146, September, Pages 119-132. 
[4] Oduoz, C. F., Odimaboa, O., Tamparapoulo, A. (2017). Framework for Risk Management Software System for SMEs in the Engineering Construction Sector, Procedia Manufacturing 11 1231 – 1238. 
[5] Rakshit, S., Islam, N., Mondal, S., Paul, T. (2022). Influence of blockchain technology in SME internationalization: Evidence from high-tech SMEs in India, Technovation, Volume 115, July, 102518. 
[6] Büyükozkan, G., Uztürk, D., Maden, A. (2023). Influential factor analysis for cloud computing technology service provider, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 192, July, 122531. 
[7] Agostini, L., Filippini, R., Nosella, A. (2015). Management and performance of strategic multipartner SME networks, International Journal of Production Economics, Volume 169, November, Pages 376-390. 
[8] Suryawanshi, P., Dutta, P. (2022) Optimization models for supply chains under risk, uncertainty, and resilience: A state-of-the-art review and future research directions, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Volume 157, January, 102553. 
[9] Lavastre, O., Gunasekaran, A., Spalanzani, A. (2012) Supply chain risk management in French companies, Decision Support Systems, Volume 52, Issue 4, March, Pages 828-838. 
[10] Kannan, D. (2021). Sustainable procurement drivers for extended multi-tier context: A multi-theoretical perspective in the Danish supply chain, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Volume 146, February, 102092. 
[11] Choi, T. Y., Hofmann, E., Templar, S., Rogers, D. S., Leuschner, R., Korde, R. Y. (2023) The supply chain financing ecosystem: Early responses during the COVID-19 crisis, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Available online 22 April, 100836. 
[12] Abdullah, A., Saraswat, S., Talib, F. (2023). Barriers and strategies for sustainable manufacturing implementation in SMEs: A hybrid fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework, Sustainable Manufacturing and Service Economics, Volume 2, April, 100012. 
[13] Sharma, P., Sangal, A. L. (2019) Building a hierarchical structure model of enablers that affect the software process improvement in software SMEs—A mixed method approach, Computer Standards & Interfaces, Volume 66, October, 103350. 
[14] Koç, K., Ekmekcioglu, O., Isik, Z. (2023) Developing a probabilistic decision-making model for reinforced sustainable supplier selection, International Journal of Production Economics, Volume 259, May, 108820. 
[15] Mamoghli, S., Goepp, V., Botta-Genoulaz, V. (2015) An Operational "Risk Factor Driven" Approach for the Mitigation and Monitoring of the “Misalignment Risk” in enterprise resource planning projects, computers in industry, volume 70, June, pages 1-12. 
[16] Powell, D., Alfnes, E., Strandhagen, J. O., Dreyer, H. (2013). The concurrent application of lean production and ERP: towards an ERP-based lean implementation process, Computers in Industry 64 (3), 324–335. 
[17] Larsen, J. (2009). A multilevel explanation of end-user computing satisfaction with an enterprise resource planning system within an international manufacturing organization, Computers in Industry 60 (9), 657–668. 
[18] Zafiropoulos, J., Metaxiotis, K., Askounis, K. (2005). Dynamic risk management system for the modeling, optimal adaptation and implementation of an ERP system, Management and Computer Security 13 (3) 212–234. 
[19] Ho, L. T., Lin, G., Nagalingam, S. (2009). A risk mitigation framework for integrated-enterprise systems implementation for the manufacturing environment, International Journal of Business Information Systems 4 (3), 290–310. 
[20] Zio, E. (2018). The future of risk assessment, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Volume 177, September, Pages 176-190. 
[21] Aven, T. (2011): On Some Recent Definitions and Analysis Frameworks for Risk, Vulnerability, and Resilience. Risk Analysis, Vol. 31; No. 4; pp. 515 - 522. 
[22] Ngai, E. W. T., Law, C. C. H., Wat, F. K. T. (2008). Examining the critical success factors in the adoption of enterprise resource planning, Computers in Industry 59 (6) 548–564. 
[23] Iskanius, P. (2009). Risk management in ERP project in the context of SMEs, Engineering Letters 17 (4) 1–8. 
[24] Yun, J. (2023). The effect of enterprise risk management on corporate risk management, Finance Research Letters, Volume 55, Part B, July, 103950. 
[25] Ingvarson, J., Hassel, H. (2023). On the strength of arguments related to standardization in risk management regulations, Safety Science, Volume 158, February, 105998. 
[26] Mitra, A., Shaw, R. (2023). Systemic risk management in India: An analytics perspective, Progress in Disaster Science, Volume 18, April, 100279. 
[27] Lengyel, D. M., Mazzuchi, T. A., Veseley, W. E. (2023). Establishing risk matrix standard criteria for use in the continuous risk management process, Journal of Space Safety Engineering, Available online 22 May 2023. 
[28] Jia, J., Li, Z. (2022). Risk management committees and readability of risk management disclosure, Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, Volume 18, Issue 3, December, 100336. 
[29] Cornwell, N., Bilson, C., Gepp, A., Stern, S., Vanstone, B. J. (2023). Modernising operational risk management in financial institutions via data-driven causal factors analysis: A pre-registered study, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Volume 79, June, 102011.

Downloads: 18339
Visits: 353043

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.