Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Comparative Evaluation on the Response of New Zealand Buildings to Natural Disasters

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jceup.2023.050702 | Downloads: 11 | Views: 338

Author(s)

Zichen Li 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand

Corresponding Author

Zichen Li

ABSTRACT

With the development of science and technology, research on the response of New Zealand buildings to natural disasters is constantly improving. The exploration of building improvement in New Zealand under natural disasters and the construction and design of natural disaster assessment models based on DRI (Disaster Risk Index) are becoming increasingly important. How to reduce building risks during earthquakes is currently a key issue that urgently needs to be addressed in the entire research on building response to natural disasters in New Zealand. In this paper, based on the relevant research on the earthquake and tsunami in New Zealand, with the help of the absolute disaster level and relative disaster level calculation formula, combined with the simulation experiment, and according to the data results, the following conclusions are drawn: under the natural disasters dominated by earthquakes, New Zealand has improved its buildings in five aspects: building code, construction standards, construction levels, material use, and construction links, and based on the DRI natural disaster assessment model, the comprehensive average reduction in building risk under natural disasters was 15.5%, while the comprehensive average reduction in casualties was 11.5%. This indicates that the natural disaster assessment model based on DRI has a good practical application effect in New Zealand's construction response to natural disasters.

KEYWORDS

Natural Disasters, New Zealand Architecture, Comparative Research, Evaluation Models

CITE THIS PAPER

Zichen Li, Comparative Evaluation on the Response of New Zealand Buildings to Natural Disasters. Journal of Civil Engineering and Urban Planning (2023) Vol. 5: 5-12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jceup.2023.050702.

REFERENCES

[1] Yum S G., Ahn S., Bae J.,et al. Assessing the Risk of Natural Disaster-Induced Losses to Tunnel-Construction Projects Using Empirical Financial-Loss Data from South Korea. Sustainability, 2020, 12(19):1-15.
[2] Zhang X H. Determination of the weights of factors influencing the overall seismic damage of buildings at earthquake sites. Science, Technology and Engineering, 2020, 20(6):2390-2396.
[3] Ricardo M., Chris P., Vladimir K .Building resilience to natural disasters: An application to small developing states. Journal of Development Economics, 2018, 135(01):574-586.
[4] AGMP., BVS., BJB.,et al. Nanomaterials for construction building products designed to withstand natural disasters - ScienceDirect. Nanotechnology-Based Smart Remote Sensing Networks for Disaster Prevention, 2022, 08(02):19-42.
[5] Wang Y., Chew A W Z., Zhang L .Building damage detection from satellite images after natural disasters on extremely imbalanced datasets. Automation in construction, 2022, 140(Aug.):1-20.
[6] Lin S Y., Chuang W C., Xu L., et al. Framework for Modeling Interdependent Effects in Natural Disasters: Application to Wind Engineering. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2019, 145(5):04019025.1-04019025.12.
[7] A L Z., B X W., C Z X., et al. Emergency decision making for natural disasters: An overview - ScienceDirect. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, 27(2):567-576.
[8] Michael B., Friedrich S M .Climate Change, Natural Disasters, and Migration—a Survey of the Empirical Evidence. CESifo Economic Studies, 2018, 63(4):353-385.
[9] Cattania C., Werner M J., Marzocchi W., et al. The Forecasting Skill of Physics/ased Seismicity Models during the 2010–2012 Canterbury, New Zealand, Earthquake Sequence. Seismological Research Letters, 2018, 89(4): 1238-1250.
[10] Liu J., Zhang G., Wang J., et al. Three-dimensional coseismic deformation of the 2016 MW7.8 Kaikuora, New Zealand earthquake obtained by InSAR and offset measurements. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2022, 13(5):415-426.
[11] Wei M., Kaneko Y., Shi P., et al. Numerical Modeling of Dynamically Triggered Shallow Slow Slip Events in New Zealand by the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikoura Earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters, 2018, 45(10):4764-4772.
[12] Azizzanjani F., Lin G., Thurber C H .Nested regional-global seismic tomography and precise earthquake relocation along the Hikurangi subduction zone, New Zealand. Geophysical Journal International, 2021, 227(3): 1567-1590.
[13] Zinke R., Hollingsworth J., Dolan J F., et al. Three-Dimensional Surface Deformation in the 2016 MW 7.8 Kaikōura, New Zealand, Earthquake from Optical Image Correlation: Implications for Strain Localization and Long-Term Evolution of the Pacific-Australian Plate Boundary. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2019, 20(3):1609-1628.
[14] Du H L., Zhang X., Xu L S., et al. Source complexity of the 2016 MW7. 8 Kaikoura (New Zealand)earthquake revealed from teleseismic and InSAR data. Earth and Planetary Physics: English Edition, 2018, 2018(4):310-326.
[15] Sheehan A F., Gusman A R., Satake K .Improving Forecast Accuracy With Tsunami Data Assimilation: The 2009 Dusky Sound, New Zealand, Tsunami. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2018, 124(1):566-577.
[16] Heidarzadeh M., Tappin D R., Ishibe T .Modeling the large runup along a narrow segment of the Kaikoura coast, New Zealand following the November 2016 tsunami from a potential landslide. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 175 (MAR.1): 113-121.
[17] Fakhruddin B., Guoqing L., Robertson R .Rapid damage mapping and loss data collection for natural disasters: Case study from Kaikoura earthquake, New Zealand. Chinese Scientific Data: English and Chinese Web Edition, 2018, 003(004):128-137.
[18] Mulia I E., Gusman A R., Williamson A L., et al. An Optimized Array Configuration of Tsunami Observation Network off Southern Java, Indonesia. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2019, 124(9):9622-9637.
[19] Mark C J., Parsons S., Holwell G I .Antennal morphology and micro-sensory architecture of the New Zealand magpie moth, Nyctemera annulata (Lepidoptera: Erebidae): diversity, distribution and dimorphism. Austral Entomology, 2018, 57(3):303-323.
[20] Durante L M., Beentjes M P., Wing S R .Shifting trophic architecture of marine fisheries in New Zealand: Implications for guiding effective ecosystem-based management. Fish and Fisheries, 2020, 21(4):1-18.
[21] Saleme Estevao. The Impact of Geological Hazards on Marine Engineering Based on Machine Learning. Frontiers in Ocean Engineering (2020), Vol. 1, Issue 2: 1-8. 
[22] Hafsa Muzammal. Ecological Architectural Design in Nature Conservation Environment Relying on Support Vector Machines. Nature Environmental Protection (2020), Vol. 1, Issue 3: 10-18.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.