The Influence of Conscientiousness on Job Performance: The Moderating Role of Job Stress
DOI: 10.23977/ferm.2023.060316 | Downloads: 21 | Views: 463
Author(s)
Xianping Ye 1, Lan Luo 2, Grace Tobias 1
Affiliation(s)
1 College of Business Administration University of Cordilleras, Baguio, Philippines
2 Human Resource Management Renmin University of China, Beijing, China
Corresponding Author
Xianping YeABSTRACT
The 21st century is an era full of opportunities and challenges. In this era, the development of science and technology, the application of 5G, and the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence have changed many industries and types of work, but human resources have always been the most scarce resource. As the smallest part of human resources, whether employees have a sense of responsibility and whether they can complete their work efficiently and achieve excellent performance is directly related to the development and destiny of the organization. This research uses SPSS 26.0 and MPLUS 7.0 software to analyze the data of 206 valid questionnaires of financial industry practitioners in first-tier cities. Through factor analysis, reliability and validity test, descriptive analysis, correlation analysis, regression analysis, etc. The hypothesis of this paper is tested and the conclusions are as follows: There are significant correlations among the three main variables, job stress, conscientiousness and job performance. There is a significant negative impact on responsibility and job performance, that is, the relationship between responsibility and job performance is an inverted U-shaped relationship, and job stress has a moderating effect between responsibility and job performance, that is, when job stress is at a high level, responsibility. The inverted U-shaped relationship between mind and job performance is stronger.
KEYWORDS
Conscientiousness; Job Performance; Job StressCITE THIS PAPER
Xianping Ye, Lan Luo, Grace Tobias, The Influence of Conscientiousness on Job Performance: The Moderating Role of Job Stress. Financial Engineering and Risk Management (2023) Vol. 6: 110-116. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/ferm.2023.060316.
REFERENCES
[1] Barrick M. R., & Mount M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
[2] Barrick M. R., & Mount M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 111-118.
[3] Chaudhry I. S., Maurice J. G. & Tajuddin H. M. (2015). Impact of job characteristics on employee emotions & work-related outcomes in Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(8), 233.
[4] Hogan J., & Ones D. S. (1997). Conscientiousness and integrity at work. In R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology, (pp. 849-870). San Diego, CA: Academic.
[5] Jungwee P. (2007). Work stress and job performance. Statistics Canada, (75), 4-17.
Downloads: | 18320 |
---|---|
Visits: | 352740 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Information Systems and Economics
-
Accounting, Auditing and Finance
-
Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management
-
Tourism Management and Technology Economy
-
Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
-
Accounting and Corporate Management
-
Social Security and Administration Management
-
Population, Resources & Environmental Economics
-
Statistics & Quantitative Economics
-
Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management
-
Social Medicine and Health Management
-
Land Resource Management
-
Information, Library and Archival Science
-
Journal of Human Resource Development
-
Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
-
Operational Research and Cybernetics