Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Reflection on Technological Aesthetics of Inhuman Tendency in Technological Development

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/phij.2023.020101 | Downloads: 18 | Views: 875

Author(s)

Ma Xinyi 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China

Corresponding Author

Ma Xinyi

ABSTRACT

The development of science and technology has always been closely related to the history of human civilization. In the contemporary era of rapid technological development, art inevitably merges with science and technology at a deeper level, and the technologicalization of art and the artisticization of technology have become the general trend. With the rapid development of technology, the art that coexists with technology is bound to continue to update and develop, and the connotation of art will be richer. The continuous intervention of technology in art has also caused a series of problems. Therefore, in the context of an era when emerging science and technology have become an important driving force for social development, it is increasingly important to pay attention to the future society and re-examine the relationship between humans and machines, art and technology. In the development and application of modern technology, it is the ultimate significance of technological aesthetics research to pay attention to the living conditions of people, pursue the fullness and richness of human nature, and constantly return to the root of aesthetics, so as to finally make the integration of art and technology have a humanistic care.

KEYWORDS

Technical Aesthetics; Inhumanity; Instrumental Rationality

CITE THIS PAPER

Ma Xinyi, Reflection on Technological Aesthetics of Inhuman Tendency in Technological Development. Philosophy Journal (2023) Vol. 2: 1-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/phij.2023.020101.

REFERENCES

[1] Kurzweil. The Age of Spiritual Machines [M]. Translated by Shen Zhi-yan, et al. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House, 2006:13.
[2] Qian Xuesen. Qian Xuesen's Lectures [M]. Beijing: Kyushu Press, 2009: 357.
[3] Zhang Fa. Aesthetics: Definition, Classics, Scope, Content [J]. Contention in literature Art, 2011 (9): 79.
[4] Marx. Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 [M]. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 1985:53-54.
[5] Xu Zhengfei. New views on Marx's Aesthetic Law [J]. Journal of Huazhong Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2003, 42 (1): 54.
[6] Fan Yugang. A Philosophical Interpretation of Technological Aesthetics [J]. Journal of Shanxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2002 (4): 94.
[7] Marcuse. Reason and Revolution—Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory [M]. Cheng Zhi-min, et al., translated. Shanghai: Shanghai Century Publishing Group, 2007:39.
[8] Wang Qin, Luo Tiantian. Comparison of the Paths of Marx and Weber's Criticism of the Rationality of Capitalism [J]. Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering (Social Science Edition), 2020 (6): 59.
[9] Marx, Engels. The Complete Works of Marx and Engels: Volume 12 [M]. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 1980:580-775.
[10] Zhu Chunyan, Zhang Li, Huang Xiaowei. Analysis of Marcuse's Realization Paths of Technical Aesthetics [J]. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 2014, 30 (11): 33.
[11] H. H. Gerth&C. Wright Mils. (eds.), From Max weber: Essays in sociology. New York oxford university press, 1946:342.
[12] Kevin Kelly. What Technology Wants [M]. Beijing: CITIC Press, 2011: IX.
[13] Zeng Ying, Qiao Ruijin. Cultural Hermeneutics of Technology: An Understanding of Human Beings [J]. Social Science Front, 2009 (3): 42.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.