Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

An Empirical Analysis of Regional Differences in Sentencing of Intentional Injuries in Tibet

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/law.2022.010307 | Downloads: 15 | Views: 514

Author(s)

Yubing Wang 1, Fei Liu 1,2, Qiyu Ge 1, Yuxue Wang 3,4

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Political Science and Law, Tibet University, Lhasa, Tibet 850000, China
2 Institute of Fishery Science, College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry of Tibet Autonomous Region, Lhasa, Tibet 850030, China
3 Fujian Xinhua Distribution Group Fuzhou Branch, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350002, China
4 Propaganda Department of the CPC Fujian Provincial Committee, Fuzhou, Fujian, 352101, China

Corresponding Author

Yubing Wang

ABSTRACT

The statistical analysis of 809 judgment documents of intentional injury crimes in Tibet shows that there is no significant difference in the sentencing of intentional injury crimes in 7 municipalities in Tibet, and the sentencing results of 7 municipalities in Tibet are lighter than the provisions of Article 234 of the Criminal Law. From the perspective of the consistency between the overall sentencing range and Article 234 of the Criminal Law, Shannan City > Ali city > Qamdo City > Shigatse City > Nyingchi City > Naqu City > Lhasa City. That is to say, the sentencing judgment of all levels of courts in Lhasa for intentional injury crimes is the lightest, and the sentencing judgment of all levels of courts in Shannan City for intentional injury crimes is the most consistent with the provisions of Article 234 of the Criminal law.

KEYWORDS

Tibet Region, Intentional Injury, Regional Differences

CITE THIS PAPER

Yubing Wang, Fei Liu, Qiyu Ge, Yuxue Wang, An Empirical Analysis of Regional Differences in Sentencing of Intentional Injuries in Tibet . Science of Law Journal (2022) Vol. 1: 44-50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2022.010307.

REFERENCES

[1] Wang Yue. An Empirical Test of the Normative Level of Sentencing: A Case Study of Intentional Injury. Jurists, 2020 (6): 69-83 + 193. 
[2] Xu Runxi. On the Influence of Victim's Fault on Sentencing in Intentional Injury Crime. Liaoning University, 2020. 
[3] Lu Ling. Empirical Study on the Application of Reductions and Exemptions for Excessive Defense -- Analysis Based on 1456 Judgments. Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law, 2022, 37 (06): 89-101
[4] Yue Ming. Jurisprudential Analysis on Conviction and Sentencing of Tangshan Hitting Case. Henan Legal Daily, 2022-06-13 (005).
[5] Wang Fang, Gan Di, Liu Nian. Research on the Effectiveness of Confession of Crime, Punishment and Leniency of Punishment -- Data Interpretation Based on Deliberate Crimes. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022 (03): 65-77.
[6] Wang Xiaoxiang, Liu Renwen. Crime specialization and its enlightenment on recidivism and recidivism precision sentencing -- an empirical study based on the criminal lives of 260 prisoners. Social Science Research, 2022 (02): 138-148
[7] Liu Chongliang. An Empirical Study on the Hierarchical Quantification of the Sentencing Mechanism -- Taking the case of excessive defense as an example. Politics and Law, 2021 (09): 131-144.
[8] Hu Jiang, Yan Di A review of the mechanism of the relationship between the defendant and the victim's acquaintances affecting sentencing -- taking the SPSS analysis of 264 judgments in Chongqing as an example. Journal of China Criminal Police Academy, 2021 (03): 40-48. 
[9] Li Yalin An Empirical Study on the Criteria for Determining the Degree of Violence in the Crime of Intentional Injury. Hubei University, 2021.
[10] Wang Zhao A study on the influence of the victim's fault on the sentencing of intentional homicide. Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2021. 
[11] Jiang Ying. Research on sentencing suggestions of guilty plea. Hainan University, 2021. 

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.