Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Position of Processing Trade in the Global Value Chain

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/ferm.2022.050201 | Downloads: 25 | Views: 928

Author(s)

Zuxuan Wang 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Harbin University of Commerce, Weifang, Shandong, China

Corresponding Author

Zuxuan Wang

ABSTRACT

At the end of 2021, the Ministry of Commerce of China will hold a special press conference to issue the "14th Five-Year Plan" on the high-quality development of foreign trade. The Sixth Plenary Session of the Nineteenth Central Committee of the Communist Party of China comprehensively summed up the experience of the party's struggle. As an important part of China's foreign trade, processing trade is bound to provide a broad perspective for Chinese to enhance the status of processing trade in the global value chain and promote the high-quality development of trade. The purpose of this paper is to find out the factors that affect the status of processing trade in the global value chain, such as technology, brand influence, foreign investment and ability to fight risks, by analyzing some data and combining relevant theories, so as to put forward corresponding policy suggestions to improve the processing trade. Trade status, thereby promoting the high-quality development of trade.

KEYWORDS

Processing Trade, High-quality Development, Global Value Chain

CITE THIS PAPER

Zuxuan Wang, Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Position of Processing Trade in the Global Value Chain. Financial Engineering and Risk Management (2022) Vol. 5: 1-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/ferm.2022.050201.

REFERENCES

[1] Munasib Abdul and Roy Devesh and Tian Xi. Differential impact of the Great Recession on foreign and domestic firms in China: Did processing trade play a role in export performance?. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 2021, 30(4) : 484-511.
[2] Bawoo Kim. What has China learned from processing trade?. Journal of Economic Structures, 2017, 6(1)
[3] Qiannan Zhang and Yiyin Huang and Miraj Ahmed Bhuiyan. The impact of Two-way FDI on the upgrading of global value chain of China’s manufacturing industry. E3S Web of Conferences, 2021, 251: 01077-.
[4] Joseph Junior Aduba and Behrooz Asgari. Productivity and technological progress of the Japanese manufacturing industries, 2000–2014: estimation with data envelopment analysis and log-linear learning model. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 2020, 4(2) : 343-387.
[5] Utz-Peter Reich. Accounting for international trade in value added: a comment on the OECD–WTO project. Economic Systems Research, 2018, 30(4) : 462-477.
[6] Mouzas Stefanos and Bauer Florian. Rethinking business performance in global value chains. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 144: 679-689.
[7] Bakhsh Satar and Yin He and Shabir Mohsin. Foreign investment and CO2 emissions: do technological innovation and institutional quality matter? Evidence from system GMM approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28(15) : 19424-19438.
[8] Environmental Research; Studies from Qassim University Reveal New Findings on Environmental Research (Foreign investment and air pollution: Do good governance and technological innovation matter?). Global Warming Focus, 2020, 
[9] Henryk Gurgul and Łukasz Lach. On using dynamic IO models with layers of techniques to measure value added in global value chains. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2018, 47: 155-170.
[10] Jakubik Adam and Stolzenburg Victor. The ‘China Shock’ revisited: insights from value added trade flows. Journal of Economic Geography, 2021, 21(1): 67-95.

Downloads: 16571
Visits: 339491

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.