Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Differences between the Legal Systems of Shenzhen and Chinese Hong Kong through the Lens of People-centred Justice and Elite Justice: From Case Filing to Judgment Enforcement

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/law.2026.050208 | Downloads: 0 | Views: 70

Author(s)

Zheng Mingwei 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Beijing Zhongyin (Shenzhen) Law Firm, Shenzhen, 518000, China

Corresponding Author

Zheng Mingwei

ABSTRACT

Shenzhen and Chinese Hong Kong, both situated in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, have developed two distinct judicial models owing to their different historical trajectories, legal traditions and social needs. Shenzhen is grounded in people-centred justice, with an emphasis on easy access to courts, predictable costs, active use of judicial powers and effective enforcement of final judgments. Chinese Hong Kong, by contrast, continues the common law tradition, placing greater weight on procedure, lawyer-led litigation, strict cost allocation rules and party-driven proceedings. These differences are therefore not merely a matter of rules on paper, but of the way judicial services are delivered. In one model, the court more actively lowers barriers to access for the public; in the other, litigation depends more heavily on professional legal services and party choice. This article compares the two systems across access to courts, lawyers' fees, allocation of costs, leave to appeal, time limits, court-initiated evidence gathering, the burden of proof in administrative litigation and enforcement of final judgments, with a view to providing a more practice-oriented institutional framework for cross-border legal services in the Greater Bay Area.

KEYWORDS

Shenzhen; Chinese Hong Kong; People-centred justice; Elite justice; Civil litigation; Enforcement

CITE THIS PAPER

Zheng Mingwei. Differences between the Legal Systems of Shenzhen and Chinese Hong Kong through the Lens of People-centred Justice and Elite Justice: From Case Filing to Judgment Enforcement. Science of Law Journal (2026). Vol. 5, No. 2, 53-58. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2026.050208.

REFERENCES

[1] Shenzhen Futian District People's Court. (2025). Notice on the Launch of Shenzhen Courts' Online Litigation Service Appointment System [EB/OL]. 29 May 2025. Available at: https://www.ftcourt.gov.cn/ssfw/wsyy/content/post_1428356.html
[2] Supreme People's Court. (2016). Bao'an, Shenzhen Launches a 24-Hour Self-Service Court [EB/OL]. 12 January 2016. Available at: https://www.court.gov.cn/zixun/xiangqing/16467.html
[3] Shenzhen Bao'an District People's Court. (2017). Bao'an Court Explores a New Internet + Litigation Services Model and Advances the Construction of Its Litigation Service Centre [EB/OL]. Available at: https://www.bafy.gov.cn/fyzx/zytz/content/post_990730.html
[4] Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China. (2009). Measures for the Payment of Litigation Fees, Article 15 [EB/OL]. 17 February 2009. Available at: https://www.court.gov.cn/jianshe/xiangqing/5092.html
[5] Shenzhen Qianhai Cooperation Zone People's Court. (2021). Notice on Litigation-Mediation Coordination Procedures [EB/OL]. 8 January 2021. Available at: https://www.szqhcourt.gov.cn/ssfw/sszn/content/post_1522513.html
[6] Nanfang Plus. (2018). Futian Issues Guidelines: Refusing a Mediation Proposal Without Justified Reasons May Increase Litigation Fees by 30% [EB/OL]. 18 September 2018. Available at: https://static.nfapp.southcn.com/content/201809/18/c1502824.html
[7] Ministry of Justice, National Development and Reform Commission, and State Administration for Market Regulation. (2021). Opinions on Further Regulating Lawyers' Service Fees (Si Fa Tong [2021] No. 87) [S/OL]. 28 December 2021. Available at: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-03/25/content_5681313.htm
[8] Chinese Hong Kong Bar Association. How Barristers Charge Their Fees [EB/OL]. Available at: https://www.hkba.org/content/how-barristers-charge-their-fees
[9] Legislative Council of Chinese Hong Kong. (2024). LC Paper No. CB(2)1184/2024(01) [R/OL]. Available at: https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr2024/english/panels/ajls/papers/ajlscb2-1184-1-e.pdf
[10] Rules of the High Court (Cap. 4A), Order 62 [S/OL]. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/hk/hk038en.html
[11] Zhonghao Law Firm. (2021). How Mainland Enterprises Can Use Chinese Hong Kong Costs Rules as a Litigation Tool [EB/OL]. Available at: https://www.zhhlaw.com/article/detail/393
[12] Chinese Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance (Cap. 484), Section 22 [S/OL]. Available at: https://www.hkcfa.hk/en/documents/court/overview/index.html
[13] Chinese Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Rules (Cap. 484A), Rule 7 [S/OL]. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/hk/hk042en.html
[14] Chinese Hong Kong Judiciary. (2025). Annual Report 2024: Caseload, Case Disposal and Waiting Time at Different Court Levels - Court of Final Appeal Table [R/OL]. 26 February 2025. Available at: https://www.judiciary.hk/en/publications/annu_rept_2024r/eng/caseload_fa.html
[15] Standing Committee of the National People's Congress. (2023). Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, as amended in 2023 [S/OL]. 1 September 2023. Available at: https://policy.mofcom.gov.cn/claw/clawContent.shtml?id=98636
[16] Supreme People's Court. (2018, amended 2019). Provisions on Strictly Regulating Extension of Time Limits and Adjournment of Hearings in Civil and Commercial Cases [S/OL]. Available at: https://gongbao.court.gov.cn/Details/1d8e94581c152f649ef2a0743e4cdb.html
[17] Guangdong Political and Legal Affairs Website. (2024). Promoting Connectivity of Hearts through Connectivity of Law: Shenzhen Qianhai Court Advances the Alignment of Cross-Border Commercial Legal Rules [EB/OL]. Available at: https://www.gdzf.org.cn/zwgd/content/post_155935.html
[18] Chinese Hong Kong SAR Government. (2026). LCQ18: Measures to Expedite the Handling of Court Cases, Annex A: Average Court Waiting Times for All Levels of Court (2021 to 2025) [R/OL]. 6 May 2026. Available at: https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/202605/06/P2026050600643.htm
[19] Supreme People's Court. Interpretation on the Application of the Civil Procedure Law of the PRC [S/OL]. Available at: https://wb.flk.npc.gov.cn/sfjs/texthtml/0d431c40e88f4a9fac8c4d1dbbefa934.html
[20] Supreme People's Court. (2019). Provisions on Evidence in Civil Proceedings, as amended in 2019 (Fa Shi [2019] No. 19) [S/OL]. 25 December 2019. Available at: https://www.court.gov.cn/fabu/xiangqing/212721.html
[21] Standing Committee of the National People's Congress. (2017). Administrative Litigation Law of the People's Republic of China, as amended in 2017, Articles 34 and 37 [S/OL]. 27 June 2017. Available at: https://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/npc/xinwen/2017-06/29/content_2024894.htm
[22] Supreme People's Court. (2002). Provisions on Several Issues Concerning Evidence in Administrative Litigation (Fa Shi [2002] No. 21), Article 1 [S/OL]. 24 July 2002. Available at: https://gongbao.court.gov.cn/Details/b07a70ac47b56532910db51aa4634d.html
[23] Standing Committee of the National People's Congress. (2023). Civil Procedure Law of the PRC, enforcement provisions, as amended in 2023 [S/OL]. 1 September 2023. Available at: https://policy.mofcom.gov.cn/claw/clawContent.shtml?id=98636
[24] Supreme People's Court. Provisions on Several Issues Concerning Property Investigation in Civil Enforcement, Articles 1, 12 and 13 [S/OL]. Available at: https://www.court.gov.cn/fabu/xiangqing/37192.html
[25] Rules of the High Court (Cap. 4A), Orders 45, 48, 49 and 50 [S/OL]. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/hk/hk038en.html
[26] Chinese Hong Kong Judiciary. Bailiff Section [EB/OL]. Available at: https://www.judiciary.hk/en/court_services_facilities/bailiff.html
[27] Community Legal Information Centre. How can I know if the judgment debtor has the financial resources to satisfy the court judgment and to pay the debt? [EB/OL]. Available at: https://www.clic.org.hk/en/topics/civilCase/enforce_judgment/q1
[28] Guangdong Courts. (2023). Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court and Shenzhen Qianhai Cooperation Zone People's Court: Deepening the Alignment of Cross-Border Judicial Rules and Mechanisms [EB/OL]. Available at: https://www.gdcourts.gov.cn/sifagaige/content/post_1363952.html
[29] Working Party on Civil Justice Reform. (2004). Final Report on Civil Justice Reform [R/OL]. Available at: https://www.civiljustice.hk/fr/documents/cjr_final_report.pdf
[30] Chinese Hong Kong Judiciary / Chinese Hong Kong SAR Government. Public Materials on the Integrated Court Case Management System (iCMS) [EB/OL]. Available at: https://www.judiciary.hk/zh_cn/e_courts/index.html; https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/202508/25/P2025082500525.htm

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.