Effect of silk fibroin dressing on postoperative wound healing
DOI: 10.23977/medbm.2026.040107 | Downloads: 1 | Views: 141
Author(s)
Xu Qing 1, Shen Jiexing 1, Ye Jie 1, Chen Shuyu 1, Shu Ping 1, Guo Guodong 1
Affiliation(s)
1 Jianhu People's Hospital, Yancheng, Jiangsu, 224700, China
Corresponding Author
Guo GuodongABSTRACT
This study aims to observe the clinical effect and safety of silk fibroin dressing, liquid dressing, and conventional collagen dressing for postoperative wound healing in sports medicine surgeries. We selected 144 patients who had sports medicine surgeries. They were randomly divided into Trial Group 1 (n=48), Trial Group 2 (n=48), and a Control Group (n=48). Trial Group 1 used silk fibroin dressing (Fuxiang Sitai Medical Technology). Trial Group 2 used liquid dressing (Guangzhou Beiaojiyin Biotechnology). The Control Group used conventional collagen dressing. The application scope of the two dressings in the trial group was non-chronic wounds, including suture wounds after surgery, laser surgery, small wounds, abrasion, and cutting wounds. We compared the incision healing grade, Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score, patient satisfaction, and adverse reactions among the three groups. The results showed that 47 patients in Trial Group 1, 48 patients in Trial Group 2, and 47 patients in the Control Group got Grade A healing. The difference had no statistical significance (P>0.05). However, 3 months after the operation, the VSS scar score in Trial Group 1 (2.39 ± 0.82) and Trial Group 2 (2.44 ± 0.79) was significantly lower than that in the Control Group (6.86 ± 1.32) (P<0.05). The patient satisfaction rate in Trial Group 1 (93.75%) and Trial Group 2 (95.83%) was significantly higher than the Control Group (75.00%) (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was 4.17% in Trial Group 1, 8.33% in Trial Group 2, and 10.42% in the Control Group. The difference had no statistical significance (x2=6.115, P>0.05). In conclusion, silk fibroin dressing and liquid dressing have the same good incision healing effect as conventional collagen dressing. But they can significantly reduce scar formation and improve patient satisfaction safely. They are very good choices for postoperative wound care in sports medicine.
KEYWORDS
Silk fibroin dressing; Sports medicine; Wound healing; Liquid dressing; Hypertrophic scar; Vancouver Scar ScaleCITE THIS PAPER
Xu Qing, Shen Jiexing, Ye Jie, Chen Shuyu, Shu Ping, Guo Guodong. Effect of silk fibroin dressing on postoperative wound healing. MEDS Basic Medicine (2026). Vol. 4, No. 1, 52-57. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/medbm.2026.040107.
REFERENCES
[1] Li Z, Tan G, Xie H, et al. The application of regenerated silk fibroin in tissue repair[J]. Materials, 2024, 17(16): 3924.
[2] Mazurek Ł, Szudzik M, Rybka M, et al. Silk fibroin biomaterials and their beneficial role in skin wound healing[J]. Biomolecules, 2022, 12(12): 1852.
[3] Yu R, Yang Y, He J, et al. Novel supramolecular self-healing silk fibroin-based hydrogel via host–guest interaction as wound dressing to enhance wound healing[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 417: 128278.
[4] Gholipourmalekabadi M, Sapru S, Samadikuchaksaraei A, et al. Silk fibroin for skin injury repair: where do things stand? [J]. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2020, 153: 28-53.
[5] Chen Z, Cheng J, Wang M, et al. In situ forming silk fibroin hydrogel dressing accelerates acute wound healing via immunomodulation and extracellular matrix regeneration[J]. Journal of Controlled Release, 2025: 114228.
[6] Yan Y, Li M, Guo L, et al. Silk fibroin hydrogel with recombinant silk fibroin/NT3 protein enhances wound healing by promoting type III collagen synthesis and hair follicle regeneration in skin injury[J]. Materials Today Bio, 2025, 33: 101957.
[7] Indrakumar S, Dash T K, Mishra V, et al. Silk fibroin and its nanocomposites for wound care: a comprehensive review[J]. ACS Polymers Au, 2024, 4(3): 168-188.
[8] You C, Wang C, Ma Z, et al. Review on application of silk fibroin hydrogels in the management of wound healing[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2025, 298: 140082.
| Downloads: | 1975 |
|---|---|
| Visits: | 154442 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
MEDS Clinical Medicine
-
Journal of Neurobiology and Genetics
-
Medical Imaging and Nuclear Medicine
-
Bacterial Genetics and Ecology
-
Transactions on Cancer
-
Journal of Biophysics and Ecology
-
Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary
-
Academic Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
-
Transactions on Cell and Developmental Biology
-
Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology
-
Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine
-
Hematology and Stem Cell
-
Journal of Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Engineering
-
MEDS Stomatology
-
MEDS Public Health and Preventive Medicine
-
MEDS Chinese Medicine
-
Journal of Enzyme Engineering
-
Advances in Industrial Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
-
Bacteriology and Microbiology
-
Advances in Physiology and Pathophysiology
-
Journal of Vision and Ophthalmology
-
Frontiers of Obstetrics and Gynecology
-
Digestive Disease and Diabetes
-
Advances in Immunology and Vaccines
-
Nanomedicine and Drug Delivery
-
Cardiology and Vascular System
-
Pediatrics and Child Health
-
Journal of Reproductive Medicine and Contraception
-
Journal of Respiratory and Lung Disease
-
Journal of Bioinformatics and Biomedicine

Download as PDF