Author(s)

Tiannan Li ¹, Linan Zou ²

Affiliation(s)

¹ Graduate School of Management and Information Sciences Gumyo, Josai International University, Togane-shi Chiba-ken, Japan
² Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, China

Corresponding Author

Tiannan Li

ABSTRACT

With the continuous improvement of social attention to corporate social responsibility, the role of collaborative management of stakeholders in the performance of corporate social responsibility is becoming more and more critical. This article focuses on the collaborative management of stakeholders in the implementation of corporate social responsibility, aiming at analyzing the current situation and problems and putting forward effective strategies. Through literature research and normative analysis, this article combs the theory of corporate social responsibility, stakeholder theory and collaborative management theory, and makes clear the related concepts and principles. It is found that there are some problems such as conflict of interest, imperfect mechanism and insufficient attention in the implementation of social responsibility and collaborative management of stakeholders. Based on this, this article puts forward some strategies, such as building a common interest base, improving the collaborative management mechanism and enhancing the collaborative management ability of enterprises, in order to promote enterprises to better fulfill their social responsibilities and achieve coordinated development with all stakeholders. This provides theoretical and practical guidance for enterprises to optimize the collaborative management of stakeholders in the performance of social responsibility.

KEYWORDS

Corporate Social Responsibility; Stakeholder; Collaborative Management; Communication Mechanism; Common Interest Base

CITE THIS PAPER

Tiannan Li, Linan Zou, Research on Collaborative Management of Stakeholders in Corporate Social Responsibility Implementation. Accounting and Corporate Management (2025) Vol. 7: 104-110. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/acccm.2025.070212.

REFERENCES

[1] Ghanbarpour T, Crosby L, Johnson M D, et al. The influence of corporate social responsibility on stakeholders in different business contexts[J]. Journal of Service Research, 2024, 27(1): 141-155.
[2] Cheng X, Jiang X, Kong D, et al. Shifting stakeholders logics: Foreign institutional ownership and corporate social responsibility[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2024, 194(1): 165-183.
[3] Macassa G, McGrath C, Tomaselli G, et al. Corporate social responsibility and internal stakeholders’ health and well-being in Europe: a systematic descriptive review[J]. Health Promotion International, 2021, 36(3): 866-883.
[4] Li J, Sasaki M. The Impact of State Ownership on Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: A Comparison Between State-Owned and Non-State-Owned Enterprises in China:[J]. Management Communication Quarterly, 2024, 38(3):504-533.
[5] Farmaki A, Kladou S, Ioannides D. Corporate social responsibility in peer-to-peer accommodation: a focus on Airbnb[J]. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 2023, 35(12): 4348-4364.
[6] Morea D, Fortunati S, Cappa F, et al. Corporate social responsibility as a catalyst of circular economy? A case study perspective in Agri-food[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2023, 27(7): 1787-1809.
[7] Orozco D. Innovation stakeholders: Developing a sustainable paradigm to integrate intellectual property and corporate social responsibility[J]. American Business Law Journal, 2024, 61(3): 211-237.
[8] Vu M C, Shin H. Securing Meaningfulness in Corporate Social Responsibility: Exploring meaning-making mechanisms via economies of worth[J]. Organization Studies, 2025, 46(2):247-273.
[9] Anantharaman D, Gao F, Manchiraju H. Does social responsibility begin at home? The relation between firms’ pension policies and corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities[J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2022, 27(1): 76-121. 
[10] Ozturan P, Grinstein A. Impact of Global Brand Chief Marketing Officers' Corporate Social Responsibility and Sociopolitical Activism Communication on Twitter[J]. Journal of International Marketing, 2022, 30(3):72-82.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Information Systems and Economics
  
  
• Accounting, Auditing and Finance
  
  
• Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management
  
  
• Tourism Management and Technology Economy
  
  
• Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
  
  
• Financial Engineering and Risk Management
  
  
• Social Security and Administration Management
  
  
• Population, Resources & Environmental Economics
  
  
• Statistics & Quantitative Economics
  
  
• Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management
  
  
• Social Medicine and Health Management
  
  
• Land Resource Management
  
  
• Information, Library and Archival Science
  
  
• Journal of Human Resource Development
  
  
• Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
  
  
• Operational Research and Cybernetics