Author(s)

Chengping Feng ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ Jilin International Studies University, Changchun, 132000, Jilin, China

Corresponding Author

Chengping Feng

ABSTRACT

In today's era of globalization, the competition among countries is increasingly fierce, and talent is the key to competition. Educational informatization can improve the quality and efficiency of education, cultivate high-quality talents with innovative spirit and practical ability, and thus enhance the core competitiveness of a country. Therefore, countries around the world have regarded educational informatization as an important part of their national strategies, increasing policy support and investment to gain an advantageous position in international competition. This paper aims to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of domestic and foreign educational informatization policies, explore their differences and commonalities, and provide references for the optimization of China's educational informatization policies. By reviewing relevant literature, it is found that there are many differences in policy objectives, key measures, and guarantee mechanisms between domestic and foreign policies, and there are also areas for mutual learning. Foreign policies focus on infrastructure construction, teacher professional development, and the promotion of innovative education models, while domestic policies have achieved remarkable results in promoting educational equity, facilitating deep integration, and "Internet + Education" innovation practices, but also face some challenges. Based on this, it is proposed that China should strengthen policy systematization, accurately enhance teacher capabilities, and optimize resource supervision and evaluation to promote the development of educational informatization.

KEYWORDS

Educational informatization policy; domestic and foreign comparison; policy objective; key measure; guarantee mechanism

CITE THIS PAPER

Chengping Feng, A Comparative Study of Domestic and Foreign Educational Informatization Policies. Transactions on Comparative Education (2025) Vol. 7: 111-117. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/trance.2025.070115.

REFERENCES

[1] Yi L ,Zimeng W ,Ruoya J , et al. Impact of education informatization construction on green innovation in China[J]. Economic Change and Restructuring,2023,56(6):4099-4113.
[2] Francesca L .How can educational psychology inform policy?[J].Educational Psychologist,2023,58(4):278-283.
[3] Zhao Q ,Qian A .High School Education Tracking and Educational Inequality:From International Rules to Chinese Experience[M].Taylor & Francis:2025-03-14. 
[4] Xuereb K .A comparative study of information and communications technology policy in primary education in two small islands[J].Technology, Pedagogy and Education,2006,15(1):31-45.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology
  
  
• Curriculum and Teaching Methodology
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Advances in Vocational and Technical Education
  
  
• Adult and Higher Education