Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

The Way of Perceiving the World for Human: Understanding Kantian Epistemology from the Perspective of Ananda's Debate

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/phij.2024.030203 | Downloads: 1 | Views: 114

Author(s)

Lin Tian 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Humanities and Social Science, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China

Corresponding Author

Lin Tian

ABSTRACT

This paper compares Kantian epistemology with "seven arguments and eight ways of return" in the Shurangama Sutra, and understands Kant's explanation of "how human perceives the world". The mind can be understood as Kant's reason. "Seeking the existence of the mind from seven arguments" corresponds to the problem of the location of reason in Kantian epistemology. There is always a distance between human cognition and thing-in-itself, and this is where traces of the mind (reason) are found. "Discerning the mind in eight ways of return" corresponds to the boundary and freedom of reason in Kantian epistemology. We can touch the boundary of reason to perceive thing-in-itself through phenomena. The mind (reason) lies between freedom and unfreedom, which is not itself conditioned by cause and effect, but is conditioned by its results. From the above, Kant constructed freedom and morality based on reason, and demands that people should know the world rationally, freely, and morally.

KEYWORDS

Kantian Epistemology; Mind; Reason; Freedom; Morality

CITE THIS PAPER

Lin Tian, The Way of Perceiving the World for Human: Understanding Kantian Epistemology from the Perspective of Ananda's Debate. Philosophy Journal (2024) Vol. 3: 12-18. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/phij.2024.030203.

REFERENCES

[1] Liang, Qichao. (1989). Drink Ice House Collection•Anthology XIII. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company. 47, 51.
[2] Cummiskey, David. (2017). Buddhist modernism and Kant on enlightenment. Buddhist Philosophy: A Comparative Approach, 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119424246.ch11
[3] Matsuo, Koya. (2015). A Comparative Study of the Epistemology of Immanuel Kant and that of Buddhism. International Buddhist College.
[4] Yu, Chunyong. (2020). A Study of Mou Zongsan's Thought of "One Mind Two Aspects" and lts Integration with Kant's Philosophy. Buddhist Study, (02), 130-141.
[5] Kant. (1982). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science. Translated by Pang Jingren. Beijing: The Commercial Press. 41-43, 47, 56, 58, 64, 66, 71, 76-79, 83, 104, 106, 110, 113, 115, 122, 130, 132, 152-154, 161-162.
[6] Tang, Hongguang. (2018). The problem of the Subject's knowledge in Kant's theory of apperception. Journal of Central South University (Social Sciences), 24 (05), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.11817/j.issn.1672-3104.2018.05.004
[7] Apostolopoulos, Dimitris. (2024). Sartre, Kant, and the spontaneity of mind. European Journal of Philosophy, 32 (2), 413-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12885
[8] Grimm, Whitney. (2021). Kant the Buddhist: An Analysis of Kantian Ethics, Metaphysics, and Philosophy of Religion in the Context of Christianity and Buddhism. Honors Program Theses, 139. https://scholarship. rollins. edu/ honors/139 
[9] Li, Xin. (2020). A Brief Discussion On the Basic Problems of Buddhism—A Reflection Based On Kant's Philosophy. Putuo Journal, (01), 257-282.
[10] Bunnin, Nicholas. (2022). A Moral Metaphysics and a Metaphysics of Morals: Xunzi and Kant. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 49 (2), 174-180. https://doi.org/10.1163/15406253-12340058

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.