Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Discussion on the Legalization of Euthanasia in China

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/law.2024.030617 | Downloads: 38 | Views: 946

Author(s)

Tianyi Zhang 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, China

Corresponding Author

Tianyi Zhang

ABSTRACT

As society progresses, individuals increasingly value the personhood and subjectivity of death, contemplating how to depart with dignity. People's Congress representative Liu Guifang advocates for legislation allowing euthanasia, asserting that it reflects the dignity of terminal patients and civilizational progress. Approximately 10% of deaths in our country result from suffering at the end of life, indicating that the legalization of euthanasia meets societal needs. It is an essential choice for improving our legal system and promoting social civilization. This article explores the legitimacy of euthanasia legalization, analyzes its hindrances, and proposes a safeguard mechanism for legalizing euthanasia, aiming to provide legal support for the dignity of patients with terminal illnesses.

KEYWORDS

Euthanasia; Legitimacy; Legalization; Dignity of Life

CITE THIS PAPER

Tianyi Zhang. Discussion on the Legalization of Euthanasia in China. Science of Law Journal (2024) Vol. 3: 113-119. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2024.030617.

REFERENCES

[1] L. Hui. Life, Psychology and Situation: A Study of Euthanasia in China [M]. Beijing: Law Press, 2011.
[2] G. M. Xian, Mark Chang. Criminal Law (3rd Edition) [M].Beijing: Peking University Press, Higher Education Press, 2007:520.
[3] H. D. Yuan. On the Constitutional definition of Euthanasia [J]. Tsinghua University, 2011, 5(05):24-33.
[4] L. H. Research on Euthanasia in China: Life, Psychology and Situation [M] Beijing: Law Press, 2011:59.
[5] C. X. Liang, Q. X. Jiu. Case Criminal Law Course (I) [M].Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press 1994:359.
[6] E. Rand. New individualism Ethics [M].Shanghai: Sanlian Bookstore 996:88.
[7] J. H. Chang, L. H. Hai. Jurisprudence Legal History Constitutional Jurisprudence Legal Professional Ethics [M]. Beijing: China Aerospace Press, 2004:153.
[8] Y. L. Xin. Report on the Legislation of China's Personality Right Law [M]. Beijing: Intellectual Property Press, 2005: 274.
[9] H. Y. Hong, L.C. Da. The Dignity Paradox in the Euthanasia debate [J].Morality and Civilization, 2015(6):37-43.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.