Discussion on the Legalization of Euthanasia in China
DOI: 10.23977/law.2024.030617 | Downloads: 38 | Views: 946
Author(s)
Tianyi Zhang 1
Affiliation(s)
1 Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, China
Corresponding Author
Tianyi ZhangABSTRACT
As society progresses, individuals increasingly value the personhood and subjectivity of death, contemplating how to depart with dignity. People's Congress representative Liu Guifang advocates for legislation allowing euthanasia, asserting that it reflects the dignity of terminal patients and civilizational progress. Approximately 10% of deaths in our country result from suffering at the end of life, indicating that the legalization of euthanasia meets societal needs. It is an essential choice for improving our legal system and promoting social civilization. This article explores the legitimacy of euthanasia legalization, analyzes its hindrances, and proposes a safeguard mechanism for legalizing euthanasia, aiming to provide legal support for the dignity of patients with terminal illnesses.
KEYWORDS
Euthanasia; Legitimacy; Legalization; Dignity of LifeCITE THIS PAPER
Tianyi Zhang. Discussion on the Legalization of Euthanasia in China. Science of Law Journal (2024) Vol. 3: 113-119. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2024.030617.
REFERENCES
[1] L. Hui. Life, Psychology and Situation: A Study of Euthanasia in China [M]. Beijing: Law Press, 2011.
[2] G. M. Xian, Mark Chang. Criminal Law (3rd Edition) [M].Beijing: Peking University Press, Higher Education Press, 2007:520.
[3] H. D. Yuan. On the Constitutional definition of Euthanasia [J]. Tsinghua University, 2011, 5(05):24-33.
[4] L. H. Research on Euthanasia in China: Life, Psychology and Situation [M] Beijing: Law Press, 2011:59.
[5] C. X. Liang, Q. X. Jiu. Case Criminal Law Course (I) [M].Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press 1994:359.
[6] E. Rand. New individualism Ethics [M].Shanghai: Sanlian Bookstore 996:88.
[7] J. H. Chang, L. H. Hai. Jurisprudence Legal History Constitutional Jurisprudence Legal Professional Ethics [M]. Beijing: China Aerospace Press, 2004:153.
[8] Y. L. Xin. Report on the Legislation of China's Personality Right Law [M]. Beijing: Intellectual Property Press, 2005: 274.
[9] H. Y. Hong, L.C. Da. The Dignity Paradox in the Euthanasia debate [J].Morality and Civilization, 2015(6):37-43.
Downloads: | 10836 |
---|---|
Visits: | 287987 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
-
Information and Knowledge Management
-
Military and Armament Science
-
Media and Communication Research
-
Journal of Human Movement Science
-
Art and Performance Letters
-
Lecture Notes on History
-
Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
-
Philosophy Journal
-
Journal of Political Science Research
-
Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
-
Advances in Broadcasting