International Trade Friction and International Business Risk Management Strategies
DOI: 10.23977/ferm.2024.070501 | Downloads: 24 | Views: 239
Author(s)
Shurui Gu 1, Ping Liao 1, Rui Wang 1
Affiliation(s)
1 School of Business, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510800, China
Corresponding Author
Ping LiaoABSTRACT
This paper focuses on how enterprises can build and strengthen their international business risk management framework in the context of international trade friction, aiming to provide practical guidance for enterprises to cope with the complex international environment. By analysing the core risks of policy risk, operational risk and exchange rate risk (currency fluctuation), the paper not only reveals the specific impact of these risks on business operations, but also innovatively proposes multi-dimensional management strategies, such as establishing a flexible supply chain system, strengthening the policy early warning mechanism, and applying financial derivatives to hedge against exchange rate risk. The study analyses the quantitative impact of international trade friction on firms' market power by using cross-industry firms' market performance data from 2015 to 2023. The results show that the friction coefficients are significantly negative, which clearly points out the weakening effect of trade friction on firms' market position, and provides a powerful data support for the business community and policy makers. Finally, the study suggests that enterprises should strengthen the construction of risk management teams, deepen the understanding of international rules, and use digital tools to improve the efficiency of risk identification and response, so as to participate in global competition in a more robust manner.
KEYWORDS
International Trade Frictions, International Business Risks, Risk Management Strategies, Economic GlobalizationCITE THIS PAPER
Shurui Gu, Ping Liao, Rui Wang, International Trade Friction and International Business Risk Management Strategies. Financial Engineering and Risk Management (2024) Vol. 7: 1-10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/ferm.2024.070501.
REFERENCES
[1] Grosse R, Gamso J, Nelson R C. China's rise, world order, and the implications for international business. Management International Review, 2021, 61 (1): 1-26.
[2] Krolikowski P M, McCallum A H. Goods-market frictions and international trade. Journal of International Economics, 2021, 129 (1): 103411-103412.
[3] Nguyen H T T, Larimo J, Ghauri P. Understanding foreign divestment: The impacts of economic and political friction. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 139 (1): 675-691.
[4] Ye M, Shen J H, Golson E, et al. The impact of Sino–US trade friction on the performance of China's textile and apparel industry. International Finance, 2022, 25 (2): 151-166.
[5] Singh D, Gaur A S. Risk mitigation strategies in international B2B relationships: Role of institutions and governance. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 136 (1): 1-9.
[6] Akinci O, Kalemli-Özcan Ṣ, Queralto A. Uncertainty shocks, capital flows, and international risk spillovers[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2022, 1 (1): 1-2.
[7] Gereffi G, Lim H C, Lee J. Trade policies, firm strategies, and adaptive reconfigurations of global value chains. Journal of International Business Policy, 2021, 4 (4): 506-511.
[8] Martin J, Mejean I, Parenti M. Relationship stickiness, international trade, and economic uncertainty. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2023, 1 (1): 1-45.
[9] Findlay C, Hoekman B. Value chain approaches to reducing policy spillovers on international business. Journal of International Business Policy, 2021, 4 (3): 390-401.
[10] Fan X. Digital economy development, international trade efficiency and trade uncertainty. China Finance and Economic Review, 2021, 10 (3): 89-110.
[11] Leibovici F. Financial development and international trade. Journal of Political Economy, 2021, 129 (12): 3405-3446.
[12] Hassan T, Song H, Kirikkaleli D. International trade and consumption-based carbon emissions: evaluating the role of composite risk for RCEP economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 (1): 3417-3437.
Downloads: | 23858 |
---|---|
Visits: | 479132 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Information Systems and Economics
-
Accounting, Auditing and Finance
-
Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management
-
Tourism Management and Technology Economy
-
Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
-
Accounting and Corporate Management
-
Social Security and Administration Management
-
Population, Resources & Environmental Economics
-
Statistics & Quantitative Economics
-
Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management
-
Social Medicine and Health Management
-
Land Resource Management
-
Information, Library and Archival Science
-
Journal of Human Resource Development
-
Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
-
Operational Research and Cybernetics