Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Legal Thinking and Examples of Civil Law: A Study on the Basic Theory of Claim Rights

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/law.2024.030418 | Downloads: 8 | Views: 104

Author(s)

Yi Huang 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Department of Law, Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Technology, Loudi, Hunan, 417000, China

Corresponding Author

Yi Huang

ABSTRACT

Legal thinking is the fundamental method for legal professionals to solve legal problems, which requires them to accurately identify legal facts, apply legal rules appropriately, and make reasonable legal judgments. In the field of civil law, the basic theory of the right to claim is an important tool for studying the relationship between civil rights and obligations. This paper aims to explore the application of legal thinking in civil law examples, especially the research and practice of the basic theory of claim rights, in order to provide theoretical support and practical guidance for legal practice. The study aims to summarize the common causes and handling situations of the right to request by analyzing all judgment documents with the words "basis of the right to request" before May 9, 2024. The study has found that grassroots courts have the highest number of judgment documents, reaching 35964, and between 2014 and 2019, the number of judicial documents increased from 1636 to 11528, a nearly 7-fold increase.

KEYWORDS

Request Right Basis, Legal Thinking, Examples of Civil Law, The Theory of Claim Rights, Legal Practice

CITE THIS PAPER

Yi Huang, Legal Thinking and Examples of Civil Law: A Study on the Basic Theory of Claim Rights. Science of Law Journal (2024) Vol. 3: 148-156. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2024.030418.

REFERENCES

[1] Mittiga R. Political legitimacy, authoritarianism, and climate change[J]. American Political Science Review, 2022, 116(3): 998-1011.
[2] Collenette J, Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T. Explainable AI tools for legal reasoning about cases: A study on the European Court of Human Rights[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 317(1): 103861-103862
[3] Mocanu D M. Gradient Legal Personhood for AI Systems—Painting Continental Legal Shapes Made to Fit Analytical Molds [J]. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2022, 8(1): 788179-788180.
[4] Mappong Z, Lili L. Right to Self Submission to Western Inheritance Law for the Heirs Of Islamic [J]. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2023, 11(2): 23-42.
[5] Kurki V A J. Can Nature Hold Rights? It's Not as Easy as You Think[J]. Transnational Environmental Law, 2022, 11(3): 525-552.
[6] Hartley T C. Basic principles of jurisdiction in private international law: The European Union, the United States and England [J]. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 2022, 71(1): 211-226.
[7] Mańko R. Judicial decision-making, ideology and the political: towards an agonistic theory of adjudication[J]. Law and Critique, 2022, 33(2): 175-194.
[8] Li S. Religion Whom the Property Leaver Has Different Religion[J]. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 2023, 11(2): 423-424.
[9] Luscombe A, Dick K, Walby K. Algorithmic thinking in the public interest: navigating technical, legal, and ethical hurdles to web scraping in the social sciences[J]. Quality & Quantity, 2022, 56(3): 1023-1044.
[10] Disemadi H S. Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies[J]. Journal of Judicial Review, 2022, 24(2): 289-304.
[11] Putra H M, Ahyani H. Internalization in Islamic Law Progressive in Criminal Law Changes in Indonesia[J]. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir'ah, 2022, 20(1): 68-90.
[12] Indriati E D, Nugroho N. Philosophy of law and the development of law as a normative legal science[J]. International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC), 2022, 3(1): 314-321.
[13] Herlina K. E-Module Newton’s Law of Gravity based Guided Inquiry to Train Critital Thinking Skills[J]. Physics Education Reseacrh Journal, 2023, 5(1): 13-20.
[14] Walters G D. Crime and social cognition: A meta-analytic review of the developmental roots of adult criminal thinking [J]. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2022, 18(1): 183-207.
[15] Mikalef P, Conboy K, Lundström J E, et al. Thinking responsibly about responsible AI and 'the dark side' of AI[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2022, 31(3): 257-268.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.