Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Legal Dilemmas and Paths to Relief in Cross-Border Transfers of Personal Data by Multinational Corporations

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/law.2024.030414 | Downloads: 8 | Views: 102

Author(s)

Yuxuan Xie 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, 102488, China

Corresponding Author

Yuxuan Xie

ABSTRACT

Multinational corporations (MNCs) face multiple legal dilemmas when transferring personal data across borders, mainly including the lack of uniform international law standards globally, the inconsistency of data legislation and the lack of clarity of the rules of extraterritorial application of domestic laws, which have led to MNCs facing great challenges in cross-border transfers of personal data. The insufficient role of international organisations in global data governance, irreconcilable differences in data legislations deeply influenced by conditions, and unclear rules of extraterritorial application prone to jurisdictional conflicts are all important reasons for the legal dilemma of cross-border data transfer. The solution to the current dilemma requires the tripartite cooperation of international organisations, governments and enterprises, through the promotion of international cooperation and coordination, the improvement of domestic laws and policies, the provision of technical support and other measures, in order to achieve the gradual improvement of global data protection standards.

KEYWORDS

Transnational corporations, cross-border transfer of personal data, data legislation, conflict of laws, international co-operation

CITE THIS PAPER

Yuxuan Xie, Legal Dilemmas and Paths to Relief in Cross-Border Transfers of Personal Data by Multinational Corporations. Science of Law Journal (2024) Vol. 3: 111-123. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2024.030414.

REFERENCES

[1] Information on: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/ 2019/07/ftc-imposes-5-billion -penalty- sweeping - new-privacy-restrictions- facebook
[2] Information on: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-54418936
[3] Schwartz P M. The EU-US Privacy Collision: A Turn to Institutions and Procedures[J]. Harvard law review, 2013, 126(7): 1966-2009.
[4] Greenleaf G. Asian data privacy laws: trade & human rights perspectives[M]. OUP Oxford, 2014.
[5] Liu Jinrui. Towards global regulation of cross-border data flows: Basic concerns and Chinese solutions [J]. Administrative Law Studies, 2022,(04):73-88.
[6] Information on: https://www.sciencespo.fr/public/chaire-numerique/ wp-content/uploads/ 2023/09/policy-brief -data- flows.pdf
[7] Zhang Shouwen. Legal Development and comprehensive Protection of consumer Information Right [J]. Law Journal, 2021,(12):149-161.
[8] See EU General Data Protection Regulation, Article 5.
[9] See California Civil Code Section 1798.100 - Consumer rights.
[10] Liang Yanni. Corporate Data Compliance Governance: From Personal data protection to cross-border data flow [J]. Social Scientist, 2023,(12):81-85.
[11] Wen Shu. Conflict of Laws caused by extraterritorial application of data legislation and China's solution [J]. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019,55(06):96-108.
[12] Ao Haijing. Data protection way of international soft law [J]. Journal of local research, 2022, 33 (02) 6:158-172. [13] Wang Qian, Gu Xueying. Employee Personal Data compliance management in European companies under GDPR [J]. German Research, 2019,36(02):117-131+136. (in Chinese)
[14] See Article 37 of the Personal Information Protection Act.
[15] See Article 5 of the Personal Data Act of the Russian Federation.
[16] Mei Ao. Data the new development of cross-border transport rules and coping [J]. China local research, 2023, 40 (04): 58-71. DOI: 10.16390 / j.carol carroll nki issn1672-0393.2023.04.008.
[17] Ye Chuanxing, Yan Wenguang. Data on China cross-border system present situation, problems and rescue path [J]. Journal of Beijing university of aeronautics and astronautics (social science edition), 2024 ((01): 57-71. DOI: 10.13766 / j.b HSK. 1008-2204.2023.2035.
[18] Guo Chunzhen, God send. The dilemma of defining the cross-border flow of personal information and its judgment framework [J]. China Law Review,2022,(06):86-106.
[19] Si Weipan. Evolution, paradigm and Mirror of the governance of cross-border Personal Data Transfer in EU [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2019,43(20):205-213.
[20] Wang Qian, Gu Xueying. Employee Personal Data compliance management in European companies under GDPR [J]. German Research, 2019,36(02):117-131+136. (in Chinese)
[21] Wen Shu. Conflict of Laws caused by extraterritorial application of data legislation and China's solution [J]. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019,55(06):96-108.
[22] See EU General Data Protection Regulation, Article 33.
[23] See Virginia General Assembly. "Virginia Data Breach Notification Law." Virginia Code, §18.2-186.6.
[24] Chen Bing. Digital enterprise data across borders compliance governance approach [J]. Journal of rule by law the rule of law research, 2023, (02): 34-44, DOI: 10.16224 / j.carol carroll nki cn33-1343 / d. 20230224.006.
[25] Mei Ao, Pan Zijun. Governance model, problem review and compliance approach of enterprise cross-border data compliance [J/OL]. Intelligence, theory and practice of 1-9 [2024-05-22]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11. 1762.G3. 20240112. 1248.002.html.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.