Author(s)

Chen Jun ¹, Liu Yue ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ Law School, Anhui University, Hefei, Anhui, 230601, China

Corresponding Author

Chen Jun

ABSTRACT

The value of data lies in circulation and the vitality of data also lies in circulation. However, China's legislation in the field of data has long been "Emphasizes Protection but Lights on Sharing ". The legal norms lack of systematic, independent, low-level and principle-based expression. As the legal norms to regulate data has natural limitations, the discriminatory determination of the data capture behavior in judicial practice has led to the difficulty of data sharing and releasing the value of the dividends. In view of this, it is important to draw on the useful experience of data regulation in the world, adhere to the principle of data sharing, improve and standardize the legal rules and informal norms of data circulation. Clarify the idea of regulating data scraping and introduce the theory of necessary facilities for data monopoly to promote the use and circulation of data.

KEYWORDS

Data circulation; data scraping; digital economy; Data silos

CITE THIS PAPER

Chen Jun, Liu Yue, Practical Dilemma and Cracking Path of the Free Flow of Commercial Data Circulation. Science of Law Journal (2024) Vol. 3: 59-67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2024.030408.

REFERENCES

[1] Lu, Chuncong. (2017). Reflections on the development of digital economy. Modern Telecommunication Science and Technology, 04, 1-6.
[2] Xu Ke. (2021). Freedom and security: China's solution to cross-border data flow. Global Law Review, 01 22-37.
[3] Chen Bing. (2023). The Logical Explanation of Multidimensional Governance in the Digital Economy. China: Law Press.
[4] Gao, Fuping. (2019). Data circulation theory the foundation of data resource rights allocation. Chinese and Foreign Law, 06, 1405-1424.
[5] Wu Changhai, ed., (2022). Data Jurisprudence. China: Law Press.
[6] Ye Ming, Wang Yan. (2019). Research on the legal system of data silo cracking in the era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Dalian University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 05, 69-77.
[7] Ouyang, R. H. (2023). Institutional logic of data Factor circulation. People's Forum-Academic Frontier. 06, 13-27.
[8] Xu Ke. (2021). The legitimacy of data crawling and its boundaries. Chinese Law. 02, 166-188.
[9] Chen Bin. (2021). Protection and competition: The functional realization of Competition Law in governing data crawling behavior. Political Law Forum. 06, 18-28.
[10] Deng, Shemin, Hou YanLing. (2021). The realistic dilemma of Competition Law protection of enterprise data and Its way out. Science, Technology and Law. 05, 1-10.
[11] Zhang Yi. (2023). Legal regulation of data scraping (Master's thesis, Northwestern University).
[12] He Jinhai. (2022). Practical dilemma and cracking path of enterprise data circulation. Southwest Finance. 11, 43-56.
[13] (2022-03-18). Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Law of the People's Republic of China against Unfair Competition.
[14] Lan Lei. (2015). Interpretation of the general provisions of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law under the perspective of the principle of Proportionality. Oriental Law. 03, 68-81.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
  
  
• Information and Knowledge Management
  
  
• Military and Armament Science
  
  
• Media and Communication Research
  
  
• Journal of Human Movement Science
  
  
• Art and Performance Letters
  
  
• Lecture Notes on History
  
  
• Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
  
  
• Philosophy Journal
  
  
• Journal of Political Science Research
  
  
• Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
  
  
• Advances in Broadcasting