Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Research on Inquiry Methods for Child Witnesses

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/law.2024.030307 | Downloads: 2 | Views: 81

Author(s)

Wang Xingyuan 1, Liu Ruiping 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Beijing Police College, Beijing, 102202, China

Corresponding Author

Wang Xingyuan

ABSTRACT

Home abuse is a serious problem in today's society, and children are usually the victims and important witnesses in this kind of crime. Although children are important witnesses to home abuse, it is often a challenge to question child witnesses effectively due to the limitations of children's cognitive abilities, memory levels and expressive skills. This paper focuses on the research of child witness inquiry methods based on psychology and explores the inquiry methods or models that can effectively improve the credibility and accuracy of child witness testimony in these cases, so as to promote the smooth detection of cases. At the same time, more diversified and flexible child witness protection measures are also explored in the study, and the child witness questioning model is integrated to help children better eliminate the negative impact of home abuse

KEYWORDS

Child Witness, Inquiry Methods, Investigators

CITE THIS PAPER

Wang Xingyuan, Liu Ruiping, Research on Inquiry Methods for Child Witnesses. Science of Law Journal (2024) Vol. 3: 45-50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2024.030307.

REFERENCES

[1] Farrar, Catherine Coolburn. The value of anatomical dolls in the psychological assessment of child sexual abuse: An evaluation of available empirical evidence [J]. Child Abuse Research in South Africa, 2017. 52-54.
[2] Ceci S J; Bruck M. Suggestibility of the child witness: a historical review and synthesis. [J]. Psychological bulletin, 1993(3) 15-19.
[3] Sun Hui. Research on the Evidence Collection and Acceptance of Children's Testimony in Criminal Procedure in China [D]. Qingdao University. 2022.
[4] Douglas Walton; Evaluating Corroborative Evidence [J].Chris Reed. Argumentation, 2008(4).
[5] Long Zongzhi. Proof of Confirmation from the Perspective of Comparative Law [J]. Journal of Comparative Law. 2020(06):14-39.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.