A Comparative Study of Undergraduates' Understanding of Scientific Virtue
DOI: 10.23977/trance.2024.060223 | Downloads: 14 | Views: 377
Author(s)
Guodong Zhao 1, Minghui Sui 1, Bingou Xu 1, Wenqing Wu 2, Zeya Bai 1
Affiliation(s)
1 School of Education Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
2 School of Philosophy and Social Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
Corresponding Author
Guodong ZhaoABSTRACT
It is of great significance to explore virtue as the internal driving force of subject moral practice. This study investigates the situation of Undergraduates in the four dimensions through the questionnaire method, including scientific virtue content, scientific virtue judgment, scientific virtue motivation and scientific virtue decision-making. The results show that the overall level of Undergraduates' understanding of scientific virtue is above medium, there are significant differences between grades and disciplines in the four dimensions.
KEYWORDS
Scientific morality, Scientific virtue, Understanding of scientific virtueCITE THIS PAPER
Guodong Zhao, Minghui Sui, Bingou Xu, Wenqing Wu, Zeya Bai, A Comparative Study of Undergraduates' Understanding of Scientific Virtue. Transactions on Comparative Education (2024) Vol. 6: 154-160. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/trance.2024.060223.
REFERENCES
[1] Nyberg, D. (2008). The morality of everyday activities: Not the right, but the good thing to do. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 587-598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9530-1
[2] Kovac, J. (2013). Reverence and ethics in science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 745-756. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11948-012-9397-0
[3] Pennock, R. T., & O’Rourke, M. (2017). Developing a scientific virtue-based approach to science ethics training. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(1), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9757-2
[4] Berling, E., McLeskey, C., O’Rourke, M., & Pennock, R. T. (2019). A new method for a virtue-based responsible conduct of research curriculum: pilot test results. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(3), 899-910. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11948-017-9991-2
[5] McLeskey, C., Berling, E., Rourke, M. O., & Pennock, R. T. (2020). The Evolution of the Scientific Virtues Toolbox Approach to Responsible Conduct of Research Training Evolution in Action: Past, Present and Future (pp. 535-550): Springer.
Downloads: | 7693 |
---|---|
Visits: | 233445 |