Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Study on quality assurance of legal aid cases for judicial review of death sentences

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/law.2024.030110 | Downloads: 13 | Views: 246

Author(s)

Zhang Jinrong 1, Zhou Zhushijie 2

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Law, People's Public Security University of China, Beijing, China
2 Lingyun Science & Technology Group Co., Ltd, Wuhan, China

Corresponding Author

Zhang Jinrong

ABSTRACT

The promulgation of the Legal Aid Act has made a breakthrough in the provision of legal aid in death penalty review proceedings, but it is not enough to improve the quantity of legal aid, for high-quality legal aid is the key. The purpose of this thesis is to discuss and evaluate the current situation and problems of the legal aid quality assurance system for death penalty review cases in China, and to put forward corresponding recommendations for improvement, so as to guarantee the right to apply for death penalty review of the accused and the right to defence of defence lawyers. In order to monitor the quality and effectiveness of legal aid for death penalty review cases, the Ministry of Justice could establish a mechanism for peer assessment of the quality of legal aid. Through the implementation of these improvement measures, the quality of legal aid will be enhanced and justice will be promoted.

KEYWORDS

Procedure for judicial review of death sentences; legal aid defense; quality assurance

CITE THIS PAPER

Zhang Jinrong, Zhou Zhushijie, Study on quality assurance of legal aid cases for judicial review of death sentences. Science of Law Journal (2024) Vol. 3: 58-64. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2024.030110.

REFERENCES

[1] He Hongqiang. Dilemma and path of appointed defense in death penalty review procedure[J]. Social Scientist, 2020,(08):109-115.
[2] Ji Xiangde. Development and Reconstruction of Legal Aid System for Death Penalty Review in China--Taking the Promulgation of the Legal Aid Law as a Research Perspective[J]. Global Law Review,2022,44(05):132-146.
[3] Zhai Wei. The mode choice of death penalty review procedure--Taking the opportunity of the inclusion of designated defense in the Legal Aid Law (Draft)[J]. Zhongzhou Journal, 2021(08):68-75.
[4] GUO Shuo. The last hold:A reappraisal of lawyers' participation in death penalty review[J]. Zhongzhou Journal, 2019,(11):53-59.
[5] Chen Yongsheng. On the Guarantee Mechanism of Criminal Legal Aid--Taking the Expansion of the Scope of Legal Aid as the Focus of Analysis[J]. Politics and Law, 2022,(06):160-176.
[6] Wu Hongyao, Wang Kai. Who enjoys the right to defense? --On the realization of "equality of defense"[J]. Jiangxi Social Science, 2022,42(04):174- 186 .
[7] WU Hongyao, WANG Kai. Research on Legal Aid System for Death Penalty Review Cases [J]. Journal of Law, 2022,43(02):49-64.
[8] Chen Guangzhong, Tang Lulu. Ruminations on the Improvement of China's Death Penalty Review Procedures[J]. Journal of Law,2020,41(02):1-10.
[9] Dong Kun. On Legal Aid for Defendants in Death Penalty Review Cases--Cutting from Article 25(1)(5) of the Legal Aid Law of the People's Republic of China[J]. Modern Law, 2022,44(06):176-188.
[10] Wu Hongyao, Zhang Liang. Defendants' Right to Counsel in Death Penalty Review Procedures - An Empirical Study Based on 255 Criminal Rulings on Death Penalty Review[J]. Law Application,2017,(07):61-69.
[11] GU Yongzhong. Legislative Discussion on the Establishment, Functions and Composition of Legal Aid Organizations [J]. Jiangxi Social Science,2021,41(06):179-187
[12] JI Xiangde. On the Chinese characteristics of the legal aid system[J]. Politics and Law,2022,(06):143-159.
[13] Liu Renqi. Research on the quality assessment system of criminal legal aid cases in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Criminal Law, 2020,(03):159-176.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.