Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Digital Transformation and International Business Theory

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/ferm.2023.061116 | Downloads: 14 | Views: 265

Author(s)

Yanjie Yong 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Zibo Vocational Institute, Zibo, Shandong, China

Corresponding Author

Yanjie Yong

ABSTRACT

The rapid growth of information and communication technologies has changed the the entire internationalization process of enterprises. As firms launch digital transformation schemes, scholars researched and revised the international business theory according to real-life business practice. These researches provided profound insight for various aspects in the field of international business. Based on recent researches of international business theory, this article conducted a generic literature review on the field of firm special advantages (FSA), expansion strategy and global value chain (GVC). The aim is to figure out how the digitalization trend has reshaped the foundation of international business theory. After a thorough analysis and examination, the author proposed several constructive advice for the future practice of internalization under the digital environment.

KEYWORDS

Digital Transformation, International Business, Theoretical Research

CITE THIS PAPER

Yanjie Yong, Digital Transformation and International Business Theory. Financial Engineering and Risk Management (2023) Vol. 6: 117-120. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/ferm.2023.061116.

REFERENCES

[1] Chen, L., Shaheer, N., Yi, J., & Li, S. 2018. The international penetration of ibusiness firms: Network effects, liabilities of outsidership and country clout. Journal of International Business Studies. https://doi.org/ 10.1057/ s41267-018-0176-2.
[2] Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. 2003. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2): 237–263.
[3] Banalieva, E. R., Dhanaraj, C. 2019. Internalization theory for the digital economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 50, 1372–1387.
[4] Kotha, S., Rindova, V., & Rothaermel, F. 2001. Assets and actions: Firm-specific factors in the internationalization of U.S. internet firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(4):769–791.
[5] Kundu, S., & Lahiri, S. 2015. Turning the spotlight on service multinationals: New theoretical insights and empirical evidence. Journal of International Management, 21: 215–219.
[6] Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Macmillan.
[7] Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2004. A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1): 3–18.
[8] Dunning, J. H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1): 1–31.
[9] Lundan, S. 2009. What are ownership advantages? Multinational Business Review, 18(1): 51–69.
[10] Langlois, R. 2002. Modularity in technology and organization. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 49(1): 19–37.
[11] Hennart, J.-F. 2009. Down with MNE-centric theories! Market entry and expansion as the bundling of MNE and local assets. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1432–1454.
[12] Becker, G. 1964. Human Capital (2nd edn). New York: Columbia University Press.
[13] Simon, H. A. 1985. What we know about the creative process. In R. L. Kuhn (Ed.), Frontiers in creative and innovative management pp. 3–20. Cambridge: Ballinger.
[14] Roth, K., & Morrison, A. J. (1990). An Empirical Analysis of the Integration-Responsiveness Framework in Global Industries. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(4), 541–564. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490341
[15] TAN, T. K. The impact of digitalization on international expansion: A study on market entry strategy based on the Integration-Responsiveness Framework. (2021). 1-163.
[16] Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490394
[17] Dikova, D., Sahib, P. R., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2010). Cross-border acquisition abandonment and completion: The effect of institutional differences and organizational learning in the international business service industry, 1981-2001. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.10
[18] Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. (1998). Analyzing foreign market entry strategies: Extending the internalization approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), 539–561. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490006
[19] Görg, H. (2000). Analysing foreign market entry: The choice between greenfield investment and acquisitions. Journal of Economic Studies, 27(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005350
[20] Autio, E. (2016). Lean Internationalization. Academy of Management Journal.
[21] Brouthers, K. D., Geisser, K. D., & Rothlauf, F. (2016). Explaining the internationalization of ibusiness firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(5), 513–534. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2015.20
[22] S. Gopalan, K. Reddy and S. Sasidharan. (2022). Does digitalization spur global value chain participation? Firm-level evidence from emerging markets. Information Economics and Policy, 59
[23] Kobrin, S. 2017. Bricks and mortar in a borderless world: Globalization, the backlash, and the multinational enterprise. Global Strategy Journal, 7: 159–171.
[24] Dunning, J. H., & Wymbs, C. 2001. The challenge of electronic markets for international business theory. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(2): 273–301.

Downloads: 16542
Visits: 339120

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.