Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

The relationship between digital literacy and academic performance of college students in blended learning: the mediating effect of learning adaptability

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/aetp.2023.070813 | Downloads: 42 | Views: 581

Author(s)

Wenzheng Wu 1, Lingmin Yuan 1

Affiliation(s)

1 College of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, 610101, China

Corresponding Author

Lingmin Yuan

ABSTRACT

Blended learning is one of the main learning modes for college students nowadays. However, the relationship between college students' digital literacy, learning adaptability, and their academic performance in the blended learning environment has not been revealed in known studies. This study explores the impact of digital literacy on college students' academic performance, as well as the mediating role of college students' learning adaptability between the two variables. Based on previous literature, this study uses a structural equation model to verify the corresponding hypotheses and tests the mediating effect based on data from 357 participants. This study reveals that in blended learning environment, college students' digital literacy has a significant direct impact on their academic performance, college students' learning adaptability can also positively influence their academic performance, and learning adaptability plays a partially mediating role between digital literacy and academic performance in the blended learning environment. These results are discussed and provided suggestions for college students' blended learning and future research.

KEYWORDS

Digital literacy; Academic performance; Learning adaptability; College student; Mediation analysis

CITE THIS PAPER

Wenzheng Wu, Lingmin Yuan, The relationship between digital literacy and academic performance of college students in blended learning: the mediating effect of learning adaptability. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology (2023) Vol. 7: 77-87. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aetp.2023.070813.

REFERENCES

[1] Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004) Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.
[2] Liem, G. A. D. (2019) Academic performance and assessment. Educational Psychology, 39(6), 705–708. 
[3] Liu, G. (2022) Research on the Relationship between Students’ Learning Adaptability and Learning Satisfaction under the Mobile Media Environment. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(2), 43–58. 
[4] Truzoli, R., Viganò, C., Galmozzi, P. G., & Reed, P. (2020) Problematic internet use and study motivation in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 480–486.
[5] Kun W. (2021) ICT Self-Efficacy and Learning Adaptation:Moderated Mediation Model [Master dissertation, Central China Normal University].
[6] Gilster, P. (1997) Digital literacy. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[7] Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004) Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia.
[8] Porat, E., Blau, I., & Barak, A. (2018) Measuring digital literacies: Junior high-school students’ perceived competencies versus actual performance. Computers & Education, 126, 23–36. 
[9] Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2012) Thinking in the Digital Era: A Revised Model for Digital Literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 9, 267–276.
[10] Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M. Y. (2008) A Study of Student's Perceptions in a Blended Learning Environment Based on Different Learning Styles. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 183–193.
[11] Ang, J. W. J., & Ng, Y. N. (2022) Effect of Research-Based Blended Learning with Scrum Methodology on Learners' Perception and Motivation in a Laboratory Course. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(12), 4102–4108. 
[12] Vanslambrouck, S., Zhu, C., Pynoo, B., Thomas, V., Lombaerts, K., & Tondeur, J. (2019) An in-depth analysis of adult students in blended environments: Do they regulate their learning in an 'old school' way? Computers & Education, 128, 75–87.
[13] Narad, A., & Abdullah, B. (2016) Academic Performance of Senior Secondary School Students: Influence of Parental Encouragement and School Environment. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8(2), 12–19.
[14] Davison, C. B., & Dustova, G. (2017) A Quantitative Assessment of Student Performance and Examination Format. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 18.
[15] Baafi, R. (2020) School Physical Environment and Student Academic Performance. Advances in Physical Education, 10, 121–137.
[16] Rashid, M., & Zaman, S. (2018) Effects of Teacher's Behavior on Academic Performance of Students. 1–15.
[17] Abbas, Q., Hussain, D., & Rasool, S. (2019) Digital Literacy Effect on the Academic Performance of Students at Higher Education Level in Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review, IV(1), 154–165.
[18] Mehrvarz, M., Heidari, E., Farrokhnia, M., & Noroozi, O. (2021) The mediating role of digital informal learning in the relationship between students' digital competence and their academic performance. Computers & Education, 167.
[19] Hayduk, L. A. (1987) Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances (pp. xvii, 405). Johns Hopkins University Press.
[20] Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.
[21] Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258.
[22] Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.
[23] Kline, R. B. (2016) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th ed (pp. xvii, 534). Guilford Press.
[24] Hair Jr., J. F., Babin, B. J., & Krey, N. (2017) Covariance-based structural equation modeling in the Journal of Advertising: Review and recommendations. Journal of Advertising, 46, 163–177.
[25] Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
[26] Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433. 
[27] Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
[28] Jinruo Q. (2019) Research on the influencing factors and intervention of blended learning adaptability of college students based on MOOC [Doctoral dissertation, Shaanxi Normal University]. 
[29] Yu, A. Y., Tian, S. W., Vogel, D., & Kwok, R. C.-W. (2010) Can learning be virtually boosted? An investigation of online social networking impacts. Computers & Education, 55, 1494–1503.
[30] Pagani, L., Argentin, G., Gui, M., & Stanca, L. (2016) The impact of digital skills on educational outcomes: Evidence from performance tests. Educational Studies, 42(2), 137–162.
[31] Prensky, M. (2001) Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. 
[32] Vaughan, P. N. D., Reali, A., Stenbom, S., Vuuren, M. J. V., & MacDonald, D. (2017) Blended Learning From Design to Evaluation: International Case Studies of Evidence-Based Practice. Online Learning, 21(3), Article 3.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.