Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Research on the Application of Unjust Enrichment Rules in Protecting the Rights and Interests of Data Originators

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/law.2025.040516 | Downloads: 3 | Views: 100

Author(s)

Cai Yuze 1

Affiliation(s)

1 China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, China

Corresponding Author

Cai Yuze

ABSTRACT

Compared to traditional tort law remedies, unjust enrichment rules—by simplifying the burden of proof and broadening the scope of restitution—better align with the dynamic nature of data value generation and the often concealed character of data-related harm. This makes them more effective in safeguarding the relevant rights and interests of data originators. When applied in conjunction with the Civil Code and the Personal Information Protection Law, these rules can establish a dual-track relief mechanism characterized as "disgorgement of gains plus compensation for losses." This mechanism effectively deters enterprises from "free-riding" on data and helps channel benefits back to the originators. To address conflicts arising from the dual attributes of data-related rights and the challenge of balancing multiple interests, this study proposes adaptable solutions, including categorical treatment of cases, a dynamic benefit calculation model, and a tiered allocation of the burden of proof, thereby ensuring effective protection for data originators.

KEYWORDS

Unjust Enrichment Rules; Rights and Interests of Data Originators; Data-Related Rights and Interests; Dual-Track Relief Mechanism

CITE THIS PAPER

Cai Yuze. Research on the Application of Unjust Enrichment Rules in Protecting the Rights and Interests of Data Originators. Science of Law Journal (2025) Vol. 4: 113-118. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2025.040516.

REFERENCES

[1] Wang Yanchuan, Lü Junzhi. "The Theoretical Logic and Practical Path of Raw Data Providers Participating in Data Element Benefit Distribution: An Examination from the Perspective of Common Prosperity." Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 52(03): 82-93.
[2] Jiang Chengxiao. "On Acquiring Data Property Rights from a Non-Entitled Party." Journal of National Prosecutors College, 2024, 32(02): 163-176.
[3] Cheng Xiao. "On the Relationship between the Civil Code and the Personal Information Protection Law." Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 2022, 40(03): 19-30.
[4] Wang Liming. "On the Applicable Relationship between the Personal Information Protection Law and the Civil Code." Huxiang Law Review, 2021, 1(01): 25-35.
[5] Wu Guozhe. "The Continuation and Development of the Restitution Rules in the Unjust Enrichment System of the Civil Code." Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 2023, 41(02): 177-189.
[6] Wang Zejian. "The Dogmatics of Unjust Enrichment Law." SJTU Law Review, 2024, (04): 5-30.
[7] Wang Yanchuan, Lü Junzhi. "Research on the Construction of the Data Element Benefit Distribution System." Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business, 2025, 46(03): 64-74.
[8] Lin Huanmin. "Characterization and Key Regulatory Aspects of Data Transaction Contracts." Law and Social Development, 2025, 31(01): 172-187.
[9] Cui Congcong. "The Jurisprudential Basis and Institutional Construction of the Initial Allocation of Data Rights." Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 2024, 42(04): 105-113.
[10] Zhang Tong. "On the Legislation of Personal Information Protection from the Perspective of Civil Code Codification." Administration Reform, 2020, (02): 28-34.
[11] Wang Ran. "Research on Diversified Proof Mechanisms for Massive Data in the Big Data Era." Chinese Criminal Science Journal, 2022, (03): 87-105.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.