Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Hands-on project driven approach for teaching non-robotics major students robot design technology

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/aetp.2024.080329 | Downloads: 7 | Views: 121

Author(s)

Xiakun Lin 1, Mukhwana Hamisi Ouma 1, Amwayi Francis Ennocent 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China

Corresponding Author

Xiakun Lin

ABSTRACT

This research paper explores effective teaching methods for non-robotics major students to acquire knowledge and skills in robot design technology. With the increasing integration of robots in various industries, it is essential to provide students from diverse academic backgrounds with opportunities to learn about robot design. The paper examines existing literature on teaching methodologies to identify best practices. The findings suggest that hands-on project driven methods combined with interdisciplinary approaches and student-centered learning can enhance the learning experience and promote engagement and retention in robot design technology. The paper also discusses the importance of incorporating real-world applications, collaborative learning, and assessment strategies tailored to the needs of non-robotics major students. Overall, this research aims at providing educators with valuable insights into effective teaching methods to facilitate the learning of robot design technology among non-robotics major students.

KEYWORDS

Teaching methods; Robot design technology; Non-robotics major students; Hands-on project driven approach

CITE THIS PAPER

Xiakun Lin, Mukhwana Hamisi Ouma, Amwayi Francis Ennocent, Hands-on project driven approach for teaching non-robotics major students robot design technology. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology (2024) Vol. 8: 214-219. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aetp.2024.080329.

REFERENCES

[1] Eguchi, Amy and Johaiva Reyes. Engage and Motivate Non-Computer Science Major Undergraduates Using educational Robotics. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Mar 03, 2008 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (2008).
[2] Lee M H, Kim B J. A Survey on Robot Teaching: Categorization and Brief Review [J].Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013.
[3] Eleni Petraki, Damith Herath, "Teaching and Learning Robotics: A Pedagogical Perspective", Foundations of Robotics, pp.43, 2022
[4] Lukas Kaul, Practical Arduino Robotics: A hands-on guide to bringing your robotics ideas to life using Arduino, Packt Publishing, 2023.
[5] Alla G, Christiane K, Nicola J S, et al. Educational Robotics and Robot Creativity: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue [J]. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2021.
[6] E. J. De Rezende Freitas, M. P. Guimarães, J. V. Ramos and C. D. Da Silva Júnior, "A Robotics Club in High School: an experience report," 2023 Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS), 2023 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR), and 2023 Workshop on Robotics in Education (WRE), Salvador, Brazil, 2023, pp. 683-688.
[7] Xia L, Zhong B. A systematic review on teaching and learning robotics content knowledge in K-12[J].Computers Education, 2018.127:267-282
[8] Aliane N. Teaching fundamentals of robotics to computer scientists [J].Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2011.
[9] Y Y, D J, S Y K, et al. The effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PjBL) model in students’ mathematical ability: A systematic literature review [J].Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1882(1).
[10] AlmullaA M. The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning: [J]. SAGE Open, 2020, 10(3).

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.