Performance Evaluation of Airport Operation and Production Based on Entropy Weight-VIKOR Method
DOI: 10.23977/infse.2021.020104 | Downloads: 11 | Views: 1397
Author(s)
Yichi Zhang 1, Wenyi Zhang 1, Shaolin Li 2
Affiliation(s)
1 School of safety science and engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300
2 College of air traffic management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300
Corresponding Author
Yichi ZhangABSTRACT
The status of airport operation and production is an important factor affecting the efficiency of airport operation. Effective evaluation of airport operation and production performance has important guiding significance for the improvement of airport quality management and the enhancement of market competitiveness. This paper takes the monthly operation of Hangzhou Xiaoshan International Airport in 2018 as an example. By establishing an airport operation production index system, the entropy weight-VIKOR method is used to evaluate the performance of the airport’s operation and production. The results show that when different decision-making coefficients are taken, the optimal month for the airport’s operational productivity is always October. A sensitivity analysis was conducted on the worst month for operational performance. It was found that the main indicators affecting the month were the number of aircraft movements and passengers. Satisfaction. Airport managers should pay close attention to these two indicators, and seek improvement measures in comparison with internal benchmarks to guide the continuous improvement of airport operation and production performance.
KEYWORDS
entropy weight method, VIKOR method, performance evaluation, multi-attribute decision making, quality managementCITE THIS PAPER
Yichi Zhang, Wenyi Zhang, Shaolin Li. Performance Evaluation of Airport Operation and Production Based on Entropy Weight-VIKOR Method. Information Systems and Economics (2021) 2: 22-26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/infse.2021.020104
REFERENCES
[1] Parker, D., The performance of the BAA before and after privatization [J]. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 1997, 33: 133–146.
[2] Joseph S. An analysis of the operational efficiency of major airports in the United States [J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2000, 18(3): 335-351.
[3] Li Xuefen. TOPSIS Model with Entropy Weight for Eco Geological Environmental Carrying Capacity Assessment [J]. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 2021, 82.
[4] Serafim O., Gwo-Hshiung T. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 156(2): 445-455.
[5] Zhang Zhuxing. Research on Key Technologies of Comprehensive Index of Airport Operation State [D]. Civil Aviation University of China, 2019.
Downloads: | 7044 |
---|---|
Visits: | 141171 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Accounting, Auditing and Finance
-
Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management
-
Tourism Management and Technology Economy
-
Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
-
Financial Engineering and Risk Management
-
Accounting and Corporate Management
-
Social Security and Administration Management
-
Population, Resources & Environmental Economics
-
Statistics & Quantitative Economics
-
Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management
-
Social Medicine and Health Management
-
Land Resource Management
-
Information, Library and Archival Science
-
Journal of Human Resource Development
-
Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
-
Operational Research and Cybernetics