Author(s)

Zhang Lehan ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ Ferguson College, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, US

Corresponding Author

Zhang Lehan

ABSTRACT

This study evaluates the effectiveness of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism in agricultural trade. Through three case studies, it is found that some agricultural legal rules under the current rules are vague, the dispute resolution process is lengthy, and the participation of developing countries is limited. The study confirms three hypotheses and partially supports the fourth, suggesting the need for reform. The study recommends clarifying legal terminology, strengthening support for developing countries, and institutionalizing mediation. These recommendations are intended to enhance the effectiveness and authority of WTO dispute settlement.

KEYWORDS

WTO, Dispute Settlement Mechanism, International Agricultural Trade Disputes

CITE THIS PAPER

Zhang Lehan. How Can the WTO Be More Effective in Resolving International Agricultural Trade Disputes?. Science of Law Journal (2025) Vol. 4: 33-43. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2025.040305.

REFERENCES

[1] World Trade Organization. 1994. Agreement on Agriculture. Geneva: WTO. Accessed February 24, 2025. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/ag_e.htm#art6.
[2] World Trade Organization (WTO). 2025. Agreement on Agriculture. Accessed February 8, 2025. https: //www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/ag_e.htm.
[3] Kowalska, Aleksandra, Anna Budzyńska, and Tomasz Białowąs. "Food export restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic: Real and potential effects on food security." International Journal of Management and Economics 58, no. 4 (2022): 409-424. 
[4] Cardwell, Ryan, and William A. Kerr. 2014. "Can Export Restrictions Be Disciplined Through the World Trade Organization?" The World Economy 37: 1186–1196. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12173.
[5] Iida, Keisuke. 2004. "Is WTO Dispute Settlement Effective?" Global Governance 10 (2): 207–226.
[6] Fiorini, Matteo, Bernard M. Hoekman, Petros C. Mavroidis, Maarja Saluste, and Robert Wolfe. 2020. “WTO Dispute Settlement and the Appellate Body Crisis: Insider Perceptions and Members' Revealed Preferences." Journal of World Trade 54 (5): 667–698.
[7] Busch, Marc L., and Krzysztof J. Pelc. 2019. How to Make the Trade Dispute Settlement System More Inclusive. Working Paper. German Institute for Economic Research (DIW). https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/196308.
[8] World Trade Organization (WTO). 2008. WTO Dispute Settlement Data (1995–2008). WTO Reports. Quoted in World Bank. 2023. Trade Disputes and the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the WTO: An Interdisciplinary Assessment, 27. World Bank Open Knowledge Repository. 
[9] Advisory Centre on WTO Law (ACWL). 2024. Report on Operations for 2023. ACWL. https://www.acwl.ch/the-acwl-publishes-its-report-on-operations-for-2023/. 
[10] World Trade Organization. 2002. United States — Subsidies on Upland Cotton (DS267). Geneva: WTO. Accessed February 24, 2025. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds267_e.htm 
[11] World Trade Organization. 1994. Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM Agreement). Geneva: WTO. Accessed February 24, 2025. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/scm_e.htm#art6.
[12] Antimiani, Alessandro, Federica DeMaria, Maria Pupo D’Andrea, and Roberto Solazzo. 2021. The US-EU Trade War: What Effects for the Olive Oil World Market? International Association of Agricultural Economists, 31st ICAE Conference. Available at AgEcon Search. https://shorturl.at/nIvhR.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
  
  
• Information and Knowledge Management
  
  
• Military and Armament Science
  
  
• Media and Communication Research
  
  
• Journal of Human Movement Science
  
  
• Art and Performance Letters
  
  
• Lecture Notes on History
  
  
• Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
  
  
• Philosophy Journal
  
  
• Journal of Political Science Research
  
  
• Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
  
  
• Advances in Broadcasting