Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Study on the difference of tibial osteotomy coverage between symmetric and asymmetric prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty by 3D simulation technology

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jfmsr.2021.010209 | Downloads: 4 | Views: 51

Author(s)

Jichao Hu 1, Cheng Jin 2, Wang Zheng 3

Affiliation(s)

1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhejiang Province Rongjun Hospital, Jiaxing, 314001, China
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhoushan Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhoushan, China
3 Department of Basic Medicine, School of Medicine, Jiaxing University, 118 Jiahang Road, Jiaxing, Zhejiang 314001, China

Corresponding Author

Jichao Hu

ABSTRACT

Objective: To study the difference of tibial osteotomy coverage between symmetrical prosthesis and asymmetrical prosthesis, and to further demonstrate the necessity of designing asymmetrical prosthesis and anatomical prosthesis. Methods: 3D simulation technology was used to simulate the operation to obtain the parameters of tibial osteotomy surface of each patient, and five kinds of prosthesis were used for optimal coverage. Finally, the coverage difference of tibial osteotomy surface of each prosthesis was analyzed. Conclusion: 3D simulation technology is an important means to study tibial osteotomy surface, which is worthy of further promotion and research.

KEYWORDS

3D simulation, total knee arthroplasty, symmetrical and asymmetrical prosthesis, tibial osteotomy coverage

CITE THIS PAPER

Jichao Hu, Cheng Jin, Wang Zheng. Study on the difference of tibial osteotomy coverage between symmetric and asymmetric prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty by 3D simulation technology. Journal of Frontiers in Medical Science Research (2021) Vol. 1: 50-53. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jfmsr.2021.010209

REFERENCES

[1] Yue B, Varadarajan KM, Ai S, et al. Differences of Knee Anthropometry between Chinese and White Men and Women. J arthroplasty 2011; 26(1): 124. 
[2] Wernecke GC, Harris IA, Houang MT, et al. Comparison of tibial bone coverage of 6 knee prostheses: a magnetic resonance imaging study with controlled rotation. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2012; 20(2): 143.
[3] Stulberg SD, Goyal N. Which Tibial Tray Design Achieves Maximum Coverage and Ideal Rotation: Anatomic, Symmetric, or Asymmetric? An MRI-based study. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Oct; 30(10): 1839.
[4] Jin C, Song EK, Prakash J, et al. How Much Does the Anatomical Tibial Component Improve the Bony Coverage in Total Knee Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun; 32(6): 1829.

Downloads: 89
Visits: 3565

Sponsors, Associates, and Links


All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.